An easy way to solve this problem is to divide 20,000 by 100
20,000/100 = 200
Answer: 20,000 = 200 hundreds
I hope this helps!
Answer:
The best answer for the question: Which would be the best way of describing the structure of Thoreau´s observations in "Civil Disobedience", would be: He moves from a consideration of his surroundings to an evaluation of the state as a whole.
Explanation:
"Civil Disobedience", better known as Resistance to Civil Government is an essay that was written by American Henry David Thoreau and it was published in 1849. It must be remembered that Thoreau became a firm believer in the need for a simpler life, one where the laws of nature themselves, and self-regulation of man, were the two norms to guide a person´s life. To show the world this was true, he isolated himself in a cabin at Warren Pond, on his friend Emerson´s estate, to live a simpler life where only nature, and his own rules as a human, frameworked his life. From this experience Thoreau also began to reflect upon the work of government and its influence on people and although he did not invite to anarchy, because he did not believe in that, he did invite people to stand up against the abuses of governments, to defend their rights, and not fear the retaliations of government, as it was inherent in people to defend their basic rights. This is why the answer is the first option.
Freedom, economic prosperity, opportunity and the rule of law were some of the values mentioned by President Reagan in Christmas talk about the family in the US. Presumably he meant these were values shared by many Americans. While these are nice sounding phrases, I believe that many Americans would doubt that they benefitted supposedly from the implementation of these policies and they certainly weren't meant for other countries such as Nicaragua where he backed the contras to fight the Sandinista's who were trying to implement these things for the vast majority of the people who had suffered so much under Somoza.
