"The speaker says she dislikes poetry but then makes an argument in favor of it" <span>is ironic about this excerpt from "Poetry" by Marianne Moore. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "d". I hope that this is the answer that has come to your desired help.</span>
Answer:
She makes claims based on behavior that are easily visible today and based on historical facts. This provides evidence for the concepts she is claiming to be occurring. This relationship between statements and facts allows it to reason and create a concrete, correct and correct argument.
Explanation:
This question is about the article "Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World" by Jane McGonigal, where she makes a deep and plausible reflection on the increasingly real possibility of human beings exchanging real world we live in for the virtual world.
McGonigal makes a series of efficient and well-constructed arguments, full of affirmations based on historical and current facts. This shows how the author knows how to use reasoning in a timely manner, creating a coherent and fluid text.
The option that best reflects the technique the author uses to support her purpose on each excerpt is number 2) “The first excerpt uses facts and statistics, and the second excerpt is told as a story.” In the 1st excerpt the author uses credible sources and statistics to show a reality of refugees in Central America and their reasons for asking for asylum. In except 2 on the other hand, the author narrates a story in the 3er person to illustrate violence, drug and social context of a boy.
Option 1 is incorrect since no narrative skills (1st excerpt) nor quotations are used (2nd excerpt).
Option 3 is also incorrect since text 1 focuses on statistics, not on emotions. And text 2 does not use long explanations.
And option 4 is wrong since no strong words are used in text 1 and the second text is told in the 3rd person point of view instead of first person.
Answer: Relationships between the Europeans and American Indians turned hostile, and rights were one by one stripped away from American Indians.
This is the sentence that best describes the conflict that the author develops in the text because it is the one that includes all the details that follow.
The fact that the Europeans arrive to America, that they created the<em> Indian Removal Act </em>and that American Indian activists continue to fight for equal recognition all come from the fact that the conflict between Europeans and American Indians was hostile, and that Europeans stripped away the rights of the American Indians.
