AU 240 consolidates the fraud triangle of opportunity, pressure/incentives and rationalization in organizing prevention. Opportunity is the demonstration being conceivable or moderately simple including access to submit the extortion. Pressure can be either a person's requirement for cash or rewards and disciplines connected to the representative by the firm; saw need to meet money related experts' profit desires; and want for higher reward and upgraded of investment opportunity esteem. Rationalization is creating reasons to legitimize accomplishing something for the most part wrong with the goal that one doesn't feel excessively blame, for example, it will just happen this one time.
The correct answer would be, Multiple possibilities.
He knew that he would achieve his ideal job at some point in his life. Zach is experiencing Multiple possibilities.
Explanation:
Emerging Adulthood is a phase in a person's life which starts at the end of the adolescence and lasts till early adulthood. In this emerging adulthood, there are many transitions a person goes through.
People usually finish their studies and join some career. In this phase of life, people must have to take many life lasting impacted decisions.
So when Zach joined a position at a low wage, he knew that he would be able to achieve his ideal job, and this is what he does not want to do for the rest of his life. This is actually experiencing the multiple possibilities. Zach has joined the position for the time being, and he knows that he would have Multiple possibilities in the future what he can grab.
Learn more about emerging adulthood experiences at:
brainly.com/question/13134787
#LearnWithBrainly
Women are better decoding facial expressions except when the other person belongs to a different culture. This is because we perceive facial expressions through our own mental representations. These mental representations are shaped by our culture and help us when we are interpreting facial expressions.
Answer:
Accept H0
Explanation:
A group of psychologists was interested in knowing whether living environment had any effect on a student's grade point average (GPA). They took a set of twins and randomly assigned one sibling of the twins to live in an urban area and the other to live in a rural area After one year, they computed the GPAs for the twins and looked at the differences. Then they calculated the test statistic, and the P-value was found to be between 0.20 and 0.25. With a 0.05 level of significance, we should <u>accept</u> H0, and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to suggest that a difference exists between the mean GPAs of the two living environments.
A p value that is less than or equal to 0.05 suggest strong evidence against the null hypothesis, so you reject the null hypothesis. A p-value greater than 0.05 indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so you accept the null hypothesis. In this study, the null hypothesis will be "living environment has no effect on a student's grade point average (GPA)", and since the p value obtained from the study is greater than 0.05, we accept the null hypothesis.
