Answer:
if she chats with her friends her enjoyment and overall mood will increase. However she will lose the chance to study economics and her grade will most likely be lower
The correct answer is - This research would be eligible for exemption because the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting. This type of research does not need IRB (IRB being institutional review board also known as ethics committee) review because the researcher will not be interacting with the children in anyway, it is purely observational and the setting is a public place, in addition all children will remain anonymous in the study, therefore the researcher is not breaking any code of ethics.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In this question, what is asked is to compare the plagiarism of the student version compared to this original version form the author.
The original version is the one that appears in this question. The version of the student is the following:
"Teachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces."
We have three options in this question: A) word-for-word plagiarism. B) paraphrasing plagiarism. C) this is no plagiarism. So, by the way, the student's answer was written, we can assume that there is no plagiarism.
It might be said that the speaker´s credibility is important to make the speech or sermon persuasive. he had helped to bring religious revival known as the Great Awakening. his sermons accused members of the church by name of being sinners. he was known for his extremism as a pastor.
