"If we wish to be free-if we mean to preserve", "if we mean not basely to abandon" AND "which we have been so long contending", "which we have been so long engaged", "which we have pledged".
Parallelism is the repetition of the same grammatical structure. There are two instances of parallel structure in this excerpt. The first is the "If we ___ to ___" structure. The second is the "which we have _______" structure. By filling the passage with this parallel structure is gives the sense of a list of reasons that all, compounding on top of one another, logically lead to the need to fight. The change from the parallel structures in the last line "we must fight!" makes this exclamation stand out and hold power.
Answer:
The correct option is <u>her?"</u>
Explanation:
The reason for the correct option:
The given sentence is a question, therefore the end punctuation will be question mark. And the sentence is in quotation mark because it was spoken by someone else. Hence, in an interrogative sentence the quotation mark will come after the punctuation.
Reason for incorrect options:
Options: her." and her".
The sentence is a question being asked, which cannot end with fullstop or point; therefore these options are incorrect.
Option: her"?
The punctuation mark that is question mark is correct, but the quotation mark will come after the question mark therefore this option is incorrect.
The mongoose is a small carnivoran animal and it is perceived differently in the Indian and Hawaiian culture. In the Indian culture, the mongoose is praised due to his ability to kill rats, snakes and others pests. It is usually kept as a pet to avoid rats in buildings and houses.
In the Hawaiian culture, the mongoose is hated since this little animal it is devastating birds nests and turtle eggs. If the mongoose continues to spread in this area, it might affect the protection of several native birds and turtles.
Thesis statement which best addresses this assignment is A. Our county is one of five counties in the state deciding whether or not to levy a meal tax on its citizens.
As the thesis statement suggests that the meal tax is proposed hence, it is still on deciding process whether to levy meal tax or not. In contrary other sentences asserts the implication of meal tax. As a result, the meal tax hasn't been levied yet, being on a deciding factor the thesis statements asks for the opinion on the proposed meal in for or against.
