no - “those four foals you bore”
no - “the support and pleasure of your old age”
yes - “each was sold at a year old”
yes - “all your labour in the fields”
yes - “your bare rations and a stall”
Kant's distinction between guardians and minors is based on the propensity of people to dwell in their own immaturity and let others take care of them. Both guardians and minors are victims of this propensity; only, they are placed on the opposite poles. Neither guardians nor minors dare to think for themselves. However, minors almost entirely give up their intellectual potential, indulging in their own laziness of the mind. They rely on different types of guardians. For example, priests are the guardians of their souls; physicians are the guardians of their bodies; politicians are the guardians of their social order, etc. Basically, they are lulled in their comfortable positions of non-thinkers. We have to say, though, that Kant doesn't judge on people for being one or the other. He just proposes that they can rise above those passive positions with the help of enlightenment.
The answer is D. You apply for several jobs you expect to be offered but don't get called back for any.
Answer:
Also, in a sentence like: "Who tuned your piano?"
Explanation:
If the question is which one is the least relevant or won't work or something the answer would be
A chart showing five jazz musicians and the number of albums they sold
but you didn't ask a question so feel free to leave it in the comments and I will answer
