Im not sure what the answer is
Stern- means to be serious and unrelenting
learn- gain knowledge
Answer:
"she expressed<em> them </em>imperfectly”
Explanation:
The speaker is not complying with concord. Her reference is ,realised by <em>them</em>, ambiguous. <em>Them</em> lacks any reference if we move backwards in the excerpt. We may assume <em>them</em> refers to what she had to say,but <em>it</em> shoudl have been used , instead. However, <em>them</em> may refer to <em>thoughts</em> that comes later in the excerpt:"She expressed<em> them</em> imperfectly her thoughts were imperfect.", in these sentences ,which are not coherently linked , we infer that <em>them</em> is referring to <em>thoughts.</em>
Orwell's revision is a parody of highly technical, quasi-intellectualist style and tone of the academia. He uses robust vocabulary, devoid of imagery that is characteristic of Ecclesiastes' sentence, big words that mean almost nothing, and certainly don't convey anything beyond their abstract meaning. Whereas Ecclesiastes' sentence is written in 1st person and highly evocative, Orwell's is impersonal, faceless, and drab.
Answer:
Paul Janeczko introduces a topic grabbing the readers attention. Asks a question, uses a quote, or states a interesting fact. By asking a question it makes the readers want to keep reading to find the answer to the asked question. He uses a quote or writes about a interesting fact to grab their attention and make them intrigued and want to read the rest to see where the story will go. He makes the audience want more so they continue to read.
Explanation:
