This statement needs facts and statistics in order to be strengthened.
This statement provides certain information. However, that information lacks veracity, that is, it does not seem reliable or accurate as it lacks facts or statistics to prove and support what is stated.
Statistics are numbers or facts that are implemented to provide convincing information. Thus, the reader wont be able to argue with facts and will feel that statistics will prove what the writer is saying. They are employed to convince a reader and to provide factual weight to an argument.
Although I do not have access to the Article 10 mentioned in the question, I can still offer an answer about the word "unanimously" and the prefix:
In "unanimously", the prefix "un" refers to "one".
- Latin prefixes are common in the English language. By definition, a prefix is a group of letters added to the beginning of a word in order to make a new word. The new word has a meaning that is related to the meaning of the original word.
- For example, take the word "ordinary". When we add the Latin prefix "extra", which means "outside", to it, we form "extraordinary", which means outside the ordinary, incredible, amazing.
- The prefix "un" can have two meanings, as mentioned in the question: "one" and "not". In the word "unanimously", the meaning is "one".
- "Unanimous" means "<u>of one mind</u>". Thus, if a decision is made "unanimously", that means people decided the same thing, as if they had one mind.
Learn more about the topic here here:
brainly.com/question/9572498?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The difference between plagiarism and collaboration is when you plagiarism you copy or paste (WHICH I DID NOT DO) but when you collaboration it is taking your own idea with someone's else and collaborate with it.
1- <span>The ancient Chinese board game “Go” is invented long before there was any writing to record its rules. A game from the impossibly distant past has now brought us closer to a moment that once seemed part of an impossibly distant future: a time when machines are cleverer than we are.
<u>Because it's an action that started and finished in the past, this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past)</u>
2- </span><span>For years, Go was considered the last redoubt against the march of computers. Machines might win at chess, draughts, Othello, three-dimensional noughts and crosses, Monopoly, bridge, and poker. Go, though, is different.
<u>This continues the same line of mistake as the first paragraph. Because it's referencing something that already happened ("Go was considered...), this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past).</u>
The game required intuition, strategising <u>and</u> character reading, along with vast numbers of moves and permutations. According to legend, it was invented by a Chinese emperor to teach his subjects balance and patience: qualities unique to human intelligence.
<u>The conjunction and is used before the last element in a list. In this case, this word should be substituted by a comma because <em>character reading</em> is not the last element on that list.</u>
3- </span><span>This week, though, a computer called Alpha Go <u>defeats</u> the world’s best player of Go. It did so by “ learning” the game, crunching through 30 million positions from recorded matches, reacting and anticipating. It <u>evolves</u> as a player and taught itself.
That single game of Go marks a milestone on the road to the “technological singularity”, the moment when artificial intelligence becomes capable of self-improvement and learns faster than humans can control or understand.</span><span>
<u>These should read defeated ... evolved. This continues the same line of thought on subject-verb agreement. If it's talking about a past event, and the rest of the paragraph sustains that idea, then these verbs should be in Simple Past.</u></span><span>
</span>
Roosevelt had big plans in relation to the military power that the USA would have because of that, he decided to empower the American navy, providing resources and technologies, to expand and modernize it, as the text says. However, he stated that the reason for investing in the navy was protection in the country, not involvement in the conflict between European countries as we can see from the excerpt "Just after the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914, President Woodrow Wilson declared that the United States would remain neutral. It would become the job of the Navy to protect the nation's neutrality at sea and at home by stationing destroyers in the Boston Navy Yard. "
However, the conflict was too great to keep the country neutral. At one point, in the name of freedom and in order to suppress Germany's injustices and barbarities, the United States decided to declare war on Germany. At that time, a large number of workers (including women, according to the text) were needed to reinforce the available resources for the war, in addition, this moment established the time to put the American navy in direct conflict and use all its modernity and structure against enemies.
Even without remaining neutral, Roosevelt concluded his desire to use the Boston Navy Yard to protect the country, as it was paramount in defense at the military level. In addition, it promoted international well-being. According to the text "the Navy department selected the Boston Navy Yard for the construction of the first ship specifically built to transport supplies and provisions for refueling the fleet abroad."
This established the United States as a major world power, as well as showing the entire world how to avoid US enmity>
