This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
The following question references the novel The Call of the Wild by Jack London.
What might fire represent with relation to John Thornton in Chapters 6 and 7? Minimum 3 sentences.
Answer:
In chapter 6, Buck feels a call from the forest that compels him to go away from the fire, from the campfires and towns, and essentially from all mankind, to go into the forest to live in the wild.
Explanation:
His relationship with John Thornton is the only reason Buck has to resists the call of the wild, so he goes back to the fire. But when Thornton dies in chapter 7, Buck loses his only connection to the human world, and finally embraces his wild nature.
Answer:
B
Explanation: because a kenning is a compound that uses two words, to describe a noun (person place or thing) so hte "thunder-fire" isnt a word. It was combined.
I am pretty sure about the second excerpt, it directly shows gods' involvement in mortal affairs
Then thus Minerva in Laertes' ear:"Son of Arcesius, reverend warrior, hear!Jove and Jove's daughter first implore in prayer,Then, whirling high, discharge thy lance in air."
And I believe that the next correct answer is
“But, tell me who thou art? and what thy race?
Thy town, thy parents, and thy native place?
Or, if a merchant in pursuit of gain,
What port received thy vessel from the main?
Or comest thou single, or attend thy train?”
The punctuation for this sentence is incorrect. Since you are attempting to combine two independent clauses with a conjuctive adverb (however). The correct way to punctuate this sentence is:
"Halloween has come and gone; however, many kids still have lots of sugar in them."
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The fallacy is that veterans should be supported.
Explanation:
Fallacies are mistaken beliefs. Things that people believe in that don't make sense. In this passage, the narrator is saying to another person that all people should support veterans(people who were in a war) because their grandfather was killed in World war 2. But, that means that the grandfather was <em>killed by a veteran</em>! This doesn't make sense. The fallacy is that veterans should be supported.
