The answer is "<span>Modeled the As-Is process, fixed the errors, and then created the To-Be process".
</span>
An “as is” business process characterizes the present condition of the business procedure in an association. Normally the examination objective in assembling the present state process is to clear up precisely how the business procedure functions today, kinks and all.
A “to be” business process characterizes the future condition of a business procedure in an association. Ordinarily the investigation objective in assembling the future state process is to illuminate how the business procedure will function, sooner or later, once changes are made.
<u>Answer:</u>
The actions commanders can take that will help them organize and interface with the myriad of relevant players and information flows are:
- delineating staff interface responsibilities and designate LNOs
- avoiding using Foreign Disclosure Officers (FDOs) as part of their staff
- reducing reliance on e-mail for sharing information
<u>Explanation:</u>
With the many different compartmentalized procedures and techniques each player brings, commanders at each level can achieve situational awareness. Experience, expertise, and viewpoints can be consolidated across many players working together and dialoguing. The Commander is one of Squad's play most important roles, since the stance holds power over all other player in the game. Players must obey orders from their Squad Lead and Squad Leads must obey orders from the Commanders.
Engenuity said to have
1. Option A is not the best choice, because the monthly payments will be too high.
2. Option B is not a good choice, because it requires too high of an up-front cost, and the mileage restriction might be a problem.
3. Option C is the best choice for my budget, and it will allow me to own a car outright once the loan is repaid.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Consumers will be unable to buy all the gas they want at the temporary price ceiling price.
Explanation:
At the time that the offer is recent for price control, demand can be stimulated by the existence of a more reasonable and affordable price for the consumer, so that there is an excess of demand against supply, which is It would imply that it should result in an increase in prices that should lead to an optimum level or breakeven point being reached at any given time, a situation that will not occur precisely because of price control.
By resenting the offer while increasing demand, despite the possible shortage, this shortage does not result in a price increase that would be normal, precisely due to the hand of the state that prevents free market development , since it restricts one of the factors that energizes it, which is the price.
The price of goods and services, as well as can increase or decrease the supply, can also increase or decrease demand, a game that alone should maintain a price that satisfies both consumers and producers, but when price control is introduced , only consumers will be satisfied, a situation that causes bidders to stop producing.
Answer:
<em><u>Any cost directly attributable to bring the asset into current location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating it, in the manner intended by the management ( Para 15) 4.1.1. Clause b</u></em>
According to this the cost must be allocated to the purchase of land.
There are three scenarios.
1) if the land with a building is purchased with the intention of demolishing an old building and building a new building then selling it all the costs would be assigned to the purchase of land.
2) if the land is purchased with the building on it and that building is used for a short time and then demolished then the building demolish charges would be expense out.
3)if the land with a building is purchased with the intention of demolishing an old building and building a new building then using it then two different costs accounts of land and building would be used. We would not demolish the old building without the new building being made so the demolish would be added in the incremental costs of the new building.
The given question is of the third scenario therefore
Costs of Land = $ 181,000 + $ 15,600 + $ 1400 + 2600= $ 200,600
Incremental Cost of new building = $ 1600
