Answer:
Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its issue is mentioned.
Explanation:
- The very first e-mailed submission from Altisource that doesn't even dispute Lucas' suggestion would have been the proposal which most definitely meets the part of the arrangement to create a contract. It is when Altisource's e-mail was approved that they committed to it. Today, if a new arrangement with added provisions is presented two days after ratification, it can not be accepted as an aspect of the binding agreement.
- If they could have some trouble with the arrangement, they could've just discussed the based distribution and therefore not approved the agreement. It would never be altered until they have approved it but the same could be known as either a contract arrangement.
Betty and bob are not married but are living together. they have a heated argument and Betty hits bob with a baseball bat, causing a major injury. bob is the father of Betty's child, Bertram. the police show up. So Betty is going to be arrested because battery on someone who is cohabiting with and has a child with spousal battery. The appropriate charge will be <span>PC 243(f)(4), which is for serious bodily injuries such as bone fracture, loss of organ or a body part and loss of memory and consciousness. </span>
<span />
Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.
Answer:
$129.35
Explanation:
Here is the full question :
What is the present value of an annuity of $27 received at the beginning of each year for the next six years? The first payment will be received today, and the discount rate is 10%
Present value is the sum of discounted cash flows
Present value can be calculated using a financial calculator
Cash flow each year from year 0 to 5 = $27
I = 10%
PV = $129.35
To find the PV using a financial calculator:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. after inputting all the cash flows, press the NPV button, input the value for I, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
3. Press compute
Option C
As a manager with D-Lighting Industries, part of Darius’ job is to make specific short-term decisions about what his department must do to achieve D-Lighting’s long-term success. Darius is involved in: tactical planning.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Tactical planning demands a company's strategic plan and establishes ahead specific short-term activities and ideas, regularly by the company board or function. Tactical planning is splitting up those intentions into practicable tasks that we can begin programming into our task management practice and schedule.
In the tactical phase, the market is acknowledging to paramount facts. Lower-level supervisors have a greater knowledge of day-to-day actions, and they are habitually the ones accountable for tactical planning. In trades and the managerial world, tactical decisions are quite common.
