"<span>For whom to produce?" is the one economic question among the following choices given in the question that </span><span>is addressed by targeting teenage buyers. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.</span>
Answer:
Investors with an experience of financial crises are better at diversifying their portfolios
Explanation:
When an investor has experienced a financial crisis in the past, and decides to diversify his investment portfolio as a result, he is using both human judgment and experience to take the best decisions available to him.
Diversifying your investment porftolio is a good decision because it reduces risk (although it may also reduce profitability so there is a trade-off). Investors with past experience tend to spread their investments in order to reduce risk and avoid large losses. They do this because they see the possibility of a new financial crisis in the near future.
Answer:
The correct answer is: No, it may not decrease the humanity of production in organizations.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term known as <em>''humanity of production'' </em>refers to that human element that gives to the company its capability of leadership and other human abilities. Moreover, when it comes to the big data analytics those programs would not decrease the humanity of production because in order to create all those programs and in order to read all the information that those programs give and to use it and implement there will be a need of using human capital to complete the whole objective. So therefore that human will be as need as machines.
Answer:
Total cash= $193,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated sales ($):
January= $150,000
February= $180,000
March= $220,000
40% in cash from that same month of sales
50% in cash from the previous month's sales
10% in cash from the sales from two months ago
C<u>ash collection March:</u>
From March= 220,000*0.4= 88,000
From February= 180,000*0.5= 90,000
From January= 150,000*0.1= 15,000
Total cash= $193,000
Answer:
True - Contracts that cannot be completed in less than one Year must be written
Explanation:
The extract from the scenario that requires focus for the answer to the question is that ''<u>In 2006 Mann and Harris were asked by HIS to work on another conversion of an apartment building</u> known as Park West. For this project Mann and Harris were again <u>orally promised </u>a bonus (above their salary) using the formula similar to the Windsor Park conversion.<u> It was understood that this project would also require two or three years to complete.</u>''
Under statute of frauds, it is required that contracts that will last for more than 1 year should be written to be enforceable.
<u>At the point where Mann and Harris were asked to perform another construction of apartment that would take up to two or three years to complete, they ought to have requested that the contract be in writing.</u>
His had taken undue advantage of the knowledge of the Law and refused to them the bonus, yet in the eyes of the Law, according to statute of frauds, he cannot be wrong.
