Most animals thrive where they can find food easily
Answer: D
Explanation
It is the correct answer because an adverbial clause or adverb clause describes group of words meant to function as a verb in a sentence.
An adverb qualifies a verb or other words excluding nouns.
It also add details to the sentence and improves the meaning.
The adverb clause should contain a verb and the subject.
In the question the subject is find food and the verb is thrive while easily as an adverb adds more meaning to the sentence.
I<span>t provides the example of sweating sickness.
This example shows the reader that there was a disease and cause of death in Elizabethan England that does not still exist to our knowledge today. Most people probably had never heard of 'sweating sickness', so when it's presented in the passage it is effective in showing that Elizabethan ailments were different than modern ones. </span>
Please find attached to this answer, a hand drawn diagram
Answer:
12.84°
Explanation:
To calculate Angle of Depression, we calculate using Trigonometric function or ratio. The Trigonometric function or ratio to be used based on the diagram is Sine
sin θ = Opposite side/Hypotenuse
θ = Angle of Depression
Opposite side = Height = 200 feet
Adjacent side = Distance of the flying bird to the observer = 900 feet
sin θ = 200feet/ 900 feet
θ = sin-¹ (2/9) or arcsin(2/9)
θ = 12.839588407°
Approximately = 12.84°
Therefore, Angle of Depression = 12.84°
The fallacy of <em>logos</em> is "the last time it rained, our local sports team won. It is raining today, so they will win tonight". It's logos because in order to persuade a target audience it uses a statement empowered by logic. The logical reasoning suggests that if the last time the match was played was raining and they won, now that it's raining again, the will win again. The logical thought is that <em>when it rains, the local team wins.</em>
The fallacy of <em>pathos</em> is "If we don't pass this environmental protection bill now, the world will probably end soon". It's pathos because this fallacy tries to persuade by provoking certain emotions or feelings to readers. In this way, the statement is more appalling to the reader and it feels more emotionally attached to it. By talking about the end of the world, the writer is<em> </em><em>trying to evoke feelings of awareness, sorrow and frightening.</em> So by provoking these feelings, <em>readers may become more aware and concerned</em> about the environmental changes that the human kind needs to make now in order to prevent the complete destruction of our world.
The fallacy of <em>ethos</em> is "My favorite teacher said that we should vote for Mr.Martinez, so I believe he is the best". It's ethos because the writer is convincing people by the credibility or authority of the speaker. In this case, the teacher represents a credible and respectful figure. So the reader <em>decides to vote for whom the teacher said just because THE teacher said that.</em>
