by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
The story begins by telling us of Equiano's early years. He was born in what is now Nigeria. When he was about eleven, he was kidnapped by slave traders and transported to America. Equiano worked on several ships, and was able to travel to many different countries. Eventually, he was purchased by a man in Philadelphia. He was able to save enough money to purchase his freedom in 1766. Equiano settled in Europe and continued to travel extensively. Eventually he wrote his autobiography and published it in two volumes in 1789.
I think it was c but I'm not 100% sure its been years since ive read the book
no it is c /vanity means/ inflated pride in oneself or one's appearance