Answer: consider options.
Explanation: After the information gathering stage, a student using the problem-solving technique or process would consider the options available to him at the next stage of solving the problem. This options been considered are usually a list of possible solutions to the problem. Each options is carefully scrutinized then compared to each other after which a decision would be reached for the best possible solution or options to follow.
Exemplified and failed expansionism
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The United States has almost doubled their territories in the period of around fifty years.
The proportions of the USA not only went up, they also went up in bureaucratic problems synonymous with territorial development in two different purchases, one of Thomas Jefferson in 1803, and the other of James K. Polk in 1848. Still a developing nation, Jefferson encountered a host of challenges in administering such a huge expanse of territory, but deftly transformed the Louisiana Acquisition into one of greatest achievements of the United States.
Rather, Polk gained his territories by means of deviants and refused to see the repercussions of brutal civil war that ultimately would engulf the Union. Two examples of leadership are seen in the United States ' great expansion, Thomas Jefferson's masterful, brave conduct, as opposed to James K. Polk's reckless and hasty behavior.
There were several adverse effects that emerged from African Americans migrating North in search of jobs during World War I, but the most significant was over-crowed and sub-par living situations.
One of the most significant <span>factors that led to the development of civilizations in ancient Mesopotamia were the Tigris and Euphrates rivers--since these rivers provided crucial irrigation for crop development. </span>
Naïve citizens allow corrupt governments.
In literature, <u>situational irony</u> creates a contrast between what the readers might expect and what actually happens in the text. The goal is to shed light on the difference between appearances and the reality, with regard to a particular theme.
Here, the irony is that even though the farm produces more and gains more money, the animals who worked for this progress to happen are not getting the profits of this improvement. All the money goes to the hands of the ruling class (the pigs and the dogs), because the other animals are naïve enough to believe that the rulers' "supervision and organisation" work is enough to justify this unfair wealth distribution.
