answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
noname [10]
2 years ago
14

What argument is Frisch making? This is the thesis statement

History
2 answers:
kolbaska11 [484]2 years ago
5 0

Frisch claims that his views on the atomic bomb were corroborated by his beliefs that had been influenced by his college studies, almost twenty years after the end of World War II. He further says that writing about the historical significance of the atomic bomb is best explained by the retrospective recognition of the mistakes made by scientists who worked on the Manhattan project. Frisch believes an atomic bomb should have been thrown to Germany, rather than to Japan, and that allies had other options to force the unconditional surrender of Japan. Scientists did not have experience in atomic particle physics to perform demostration before use, because any demonstrations would force Japan to surrender with minimal human losses, otherwise there was no way to avoid huge human losses by detonating atomic bombs.

xxMikexx [17]2 years ago
4 0
Demonstration of the atomic bomb before deploying it might have<span> put pressure on Japan to surrender with minimal loss of life.</span>
You might be interested in
In the seventeenth century, physicians and other scientists did not routinely perform autopsies. Which statement best illustrate
KIM [24]

The correct statement which best illustrates the cause and effect is:

“At this time, it was considered culturally unacceptable to deface the dead; therefore, physicians did not know much about internal anatomy.”

<span>Due to tradition and religious belief, and moral reasons, it was considered to be a sin to do experimentations with the dead. And because of that, there was only few knowledge about internal organs and internal diseases back then. </span>

4 0
2 years ago
What was one key role of Iroquois women?
SpyIntel [72]

Iroquois women were the keepers of culture in their tribe. Eventhough, they were responsable of politics, social and spiritual community, and economic norms, one of their key roles was farming. The iroquois were an agricultured people and the women were responsable for tending the crops. While men took care of the ground for planting, women gather the crops like; corn, beans and squash.

In conclusion, the correct answer would be A, They farmed.

6 0
2 years ago
Which statement describes the Western Roman Empire after the Pax Romana?
Pavel [41]
The empire suffered from political and economic instability

hope this helps!

pls put brainiest
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Which is an example of hyperbole?
Volgvan

Answer: his tons of flesh had been only so much gossamer  I think

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What problems do Mchanagma and Verdirame see with the current state of human rights in the international system in their article
sineoko [7]

Answer and Explanation:

Jacob Mchangama and Guglielmo Verdirame, in their article “The Danger of Human Rights Proliferation,” defend liberty by the motto of “less are more.”

We are asserting more and more rights without checking out the implementation of previous rights. Asserting more rights and convincing the states to add them in treaties would not lead to more excellent protection of human rights.

The proliferation of rights is more harmful to humans because human rights are not protected fully as we are expanding the number of rights in treaties.

They argued that: “If human rights were a currency, its value would be free fall……..this currency is  buy cover for dictatorships ”

Rights of human language have been used to restrict rights. Freedom of religion and expression was a foundation of human rights, but states also restricted those rights in the name of human rights.

To sum up, the proliferation of human rights does not ensure that the rights of humans are being secured. States are not always concerned directly with the welfare of humans but to restrict those rights more. So the proliferation of rights is not fruitful but a dangerous thing.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What problem did Americans face at home as the War of 1812 developed at sea?
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes how land, as one of the four factors of production, contributed to the development of an industr
    9·2 answers
  • 1. Which conditions were true of women in the early Roman republic? Select all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Which statements describe characteristics of a “Renaissance man”? Select all that apply
    8·2 answers
  • Test your knowledge about 1950s values by reading the statement below and answering the question that follows. Terrell is a teen
    7·2 answers
  • Match each law with the effect it had on the British population.
    9·2 answers
  • In this task, you will reference your notes from Task 1 and any additional sources you gather in order to create a slideshow pre
    7·1 answer
  • The Achaemenid Empire
    11·1 answer
  • How is "...paying taxes without appeal when laws do not suit us" similar to the American Revolutionary war cry "no taxation with
    15·1 answer
  • What can we learn from reading the biography of rajendra laxmi and bhadhur sah​
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!