Hello.
The best answer would be D.
Have a nice day
Answer:
First the Vikings moved from Scandinavia to England and France then they started trading with the people and eventually they went off and started raiding other areas
Explanation:
The history of Vikings can be traced to around 800 A.D when the Scandinavian people move outward to Europe in a series of conquest move known as raiding.
The most famous of their trades were known to the raiding of Lindisfarne in 793 AD, a close island to England.
According to various historians, the Scandinavian raiders started as traders, before they become invaders who finally move to England and France at the pinnacle of their raiding expeditions.
Hence, the statements that best illustrates how Viking tactics to gain wealth changed over time are "First the Vikings moved from Scandinavia to England and France then they started trading with the people and eventually, they went off and started raiding other areas."
Answer:
Portugal and Spain became the early leaders in the Age of Exploration. Through the Treaty of Tordesillas the two countries agreed to divide up the New World. Spain got most of the Americas while Portugal got Brazil, India, and Asia.
The voyages of explorers had a dramatic impact on European trade. As a result, more goods, raw materials and precious metals entered Europe. New trade centers developed, especially in the Netherlands and England. Exploration and trade led to the growth of capitalism.
Explanation:
Answer;
Populist Party
-The Grange evolved into the Populist party
Explanation;
-The Patrons of Husbandry, or the Grange, was founded in 1867 to advance methods of agriculture, as well as to promote the social and economic needs of farmers in the United States.
-Although the Grange, like the Masons, began primarily as a social organization designed to provide educational and recreational opportunities for farmers, it evolved into a major political force. Grange evolved into populist party.
Answer:
did not foster trust and cooperation.
Explanation:
Developing more favorable attitudes among participants in a dispute in cooperative situations fosters greater mutual trust and openness of communication, as well as providing a more stable basis for continued cooperation, despite the growth or undermining of certain objectives. This also encourages a perception of similarity of attitudes. However, communication does not bring the same benefits when participants are competitors. In this case, communication does not foster trust and cooperation.
