Please read the following statements (excerpt from an original source, and excerpt from a student's paper) and indicate whether it is considered plagiarism, and if so, what type of plagiarism.
Original Source Material:
The study of learning derives from essentially two sources. Because learning involves the acquisition of knowledge, the first concerns the nature of knowledge and how we come to know things…. The second source in which modern learning theory is rooted concerns the nature and representation of mental life.
References: Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Student Version:
The study of learning derives from essentially two sources. The first concerns the nature of knowledge and how we come to know things. The second source concerns the nature and representation of mental life.
References: Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Answer:
It is not considered plagiarism
Explanation
It is not plagiarism because the student reference the real owner of the idea.
And the student also paraphrase the statement without copy the original word for word.
To make the sentence correct, you would add a comma after "Thursday" (option B).
This past Thursday, the mechanic told me my car needed new brakes.
1. Veracity and construction are important factors in evaluating an argument. Well-constructed arguments are clear, simple and straightforward, allowing a quick understanding and understanding of the spoken subject. Veracity is also essential, because it shows that the argument is true and that it is passing on correct information.
2. These factors are important because they allow the construction of a coherent, respectful, intriguing and cohesive debate. This is because a debate with well-constructed and true arguments, is capable of demonstrating various facets of a topic efficiently and thoroughly.
3. Deductive arguments are those that contain enough information for a conclusion on a given topic to be created, inductive arguments, on the other hand, do not promote the creation of a conclusion, but provide information that provides the basis and the necessary grounds for there to be a deduction and valid reasoning.
4. In order to answer the fourth question, it would be necessary to know the activities and concepts that you have studied, but you can answer that question by highlighting the activity or concept that best matched your personality and beliefs. Then you can explain that the concepts and activities that you did not highlight are concepts that are complicated for your understanding, or that do not match your personal values on some points.
Answer:
(D) because Hades is convinced of Orpheus’s love and grants him his wish
Explanation:
Theme in literature are used to entertain, to teach a moral lesson, to convey meaning, or more importantly, to make the reader aware of some aspect of the human condition. The writers creatively share their ideas and express themes that are timeless and universal.
The meeting with Hades is the way the writer develops the theme with a specific purpose. The purpose is by meeting with Orpheus, Hades gives him the opportunity to realize his wish, which was to return Orpheus's wife, Eurydice, into the world of the living. This meeting creates the setting for what the tragedy that is to come.
The correct answer is C. The words "struck harsh upon my ears" suggest an irritated tone. The excerpt shows the narrator sitting in his study when an old acquaintance, Rahmun, shows up. His reaction, however, is not positive. After inquiring, he learns that Rahmun has just been released from jail. This makes the narrator recoil in disgust, since he had never before talked with an ex-convict, and he thinks to himself that it would have been better had he not shown up.