The writer wants to develop the main idea of the third paragraph by adding additional information after sentence 11. Which of th
e following choices would best accomplish this goal? A detailed description of an art gallery where Eliasson has shown his work
An explanation of the differences between how concert halls and art galleries are designed
An anecdote about a group of people who met and became friends at a concert in their neighborhood
An explanation of why Eliasson has become particularly concerned with the role of art in community building
A dictionary definition of the word "gallery"
An anecdote about a group of people who met and became friends at a concert in their neighborhood
Explanation:
Of the choices provided, a narrative about people who met at a local art event would most effectively develop the paragraph’s point that art can develop unexpected, as opposed to existing, social connections between people. Such a narrative would follow effectively from the direct quotation in sentence 11, because the people meeting at a local art event would be in close physical, or bodily, proximity. The narrative would also provide an effective contrast to the example of the existing community of stylists and their patrons developed in the previous paragraph.
A detailed description of an art gallery where Eliasson has shown his work.
Explanation:
The readers accept script that is easy to understand. Those authors are successful who are able to connect to audience through his script. The reader will require additional information with the passage to understand the thoughts that author is willing to convey.
<span>God hardens Pharaoh’s heart again to make him chase the Israelites. God will then save his people by parting the red sea for them to cross to the other side. God then rushes the water on the Egyptians and drowns them. In this way he makes himself glorified to the Israelites. God’s people will now see the power of the God who chose then. </span>
As in the sentence above, a simile is a figure of speech which compares two different things, in order to make the description more intense or forceful. Another example could be: