Chaucer uses specific details to describe individual characters in the "General Prologue" to The Canterbury Tales.<span> The tales that the characters choose to tell reflect their true selves.</span><span> Chaucer draws on the </span><span>class estates noble peasants </span>satire prevalent in his time to bring out the traits of the different classes of society.<span> He uses the technique of </span><span>frame skeleton fable folk </span>story to hold the narrative together.NextReset
The correct answer is:
A violent or destructive protest
According to the law of rights, everyone is allowed to join a protest but in a peaceful manner. In case, the protest leads to extremism, then the government is authorized to take necessary actions, with the help of law enforcement officials, in order to control the situation. And hence the protestors can be arrested and accused of violating the rule of laws.
I believe below are the statements:
<span>-The new industrial technologies improved means of transportation.
-The industrial developments caused friction between Europe and North America.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions here.
</span>
I would say the answer is D., sadly. African Americans did not receive equal pay as whites did.
~ Montesquieu, known as the Balanced Democrat would be the best choice.
Montesquieu did not describe a social contract as such. But he said that the state of war among individuals and nations led to human laws and government.
Montesquieu wrote that the main purpose of government is to maintain law and order, political liberty, and the property of the individual. Montesquieu opposed the absolute monarchy of his home country and favored the English system as the best model of government.
Montesquieu somewhat misinterpreted how political power was actually exercised in England. When he wrote The Spirit of the Laws, power was concentrated pretty much in Parliament, the national legislature. Montesquieu thought he saw a separation and balancing of the powers of government in England.
Montesquieu viewed the English king as exercising executive power balanced by the law-making Parliament, which was itself divided into the House of Lords and the House of Commons, each checking the other. Then, the executive and legislative branches were still further balanced by an independent court system.
Montesquieu concluded that the best form of government was one in which the legislative, executive, and judicial powers were separate and kept each other in check to prevent any branch from becoming too powerful. He believed that uniting these powers, as in the monarchy of Louis XIV, would lead to despotism. While Montesquieu’s separation of powers theory did not accurately describe the government of England, Americans later adopted it as the foundation of the U.S. Constitution.
