1. New Imperialism
2. Social Darwinism
3. raw materials
4. India
5. Missionaries
6. sepoy
7. New Imperialism focused on Africa and Asia, while the previous wave of imperialism focused on the Americas. New Imperialism involved Russia and Japan, in addition to European nations while the previous imperialism only involved the latter. New technologies, such as the machine gun, were important in conquering the colonies during New Imperialism. Industrialization drove New Imperialism, whereas the previous wave helped develop industrialization. Private corporations were a part of New Imperialism, which was different from previous imperialism. Both types of imperialism saw dominant countries invade others to extract raw materials and leverage cheap or forced labor to create wealth. Attitudes of superiority due to ethnicity and religious differences rationalized both types of imperialism.
8. Social Darwinism was a theory that stated that some races were more evolved than others. This gave Europeans a justification for conquering "less civilized" continents such as Africa and Asia.
9. New Imperialism was motivated by the desire of Europeans and the Japanese to control raw materials and use cheap or forced labor. Africa and Asia were rich in raw materials such as gold, tea, diamonds, and spices, all of which were valuable in European economies.
10. Western education and Christian religion impacted colonial societies by converting indigenous peoples to Western practices. Peoples who adopted Western ways could enjoy advancement in colonial society. However, these practices sometimes came into conflict with traditional cultural practices.
straight from pf my guy
Based on the reading, Upton Sinclair would most likely agree that the government must have a role in regulation of the <span>meatpacking companies.</span>
During this case, the court decided the New York law was against the Constitution.
In other words, because the first amendment prevents the creation of laws against freedom of speech, the act of censorship based on religious standards was a violation of the first amendment. The court thus decided to nullify the New York law.
This particular case was a landmark for the decline of movie censorship.
Technically yes, the French citizens fought a successful revolution for liberty and equality, but because of ramped mismanagement, there quickly emerged a new despot who took away much of that liberty.
Crow and seagull try to snatch food from each other
plz mark brainliest
