Answer:
A). The writer uses empirical evidence by including specific data about student debt and loans.
B). The writer uses empirical evidence by stating the exact amount of debt that his daughter owes.
F). The writer uses anecdotal evidence by sharing a personal connection to the student debt problem.
Explanation:
The authors employ a variety of evidences to substantiate their claim in order to establish their credibility and validity of their claim. In the given passage, the author primarily employs 'anecdotal and empirical evidences' to authenticate their claim.
'Empirical evidence' is illustrated as the evidence that are produced or generated by the researchers through necessary experimentation and observation(here the father recognizes the amount of money his daughter owes i.e. $50,000 and inclusion of particular data regarding student debts and loans). While the 'Anecdotal evidence' is described as the evidence molded in the form of a story that involves decisive reliability on personal testimonies(here the father presents his personal affiliation to wider issue of student debt). Thus, <u>options A, B, and F</u> are correct.
I. Things I remember best
A: Nursery school days
<span>B: Kindergarten
1. Opening days
</span>2. Learning to read
3. <span>Graduation
II. Elementary school
A. First grade mysteries
1. New surroundings
2. New teacher
3. New rules
</span><span>4. School work
5. Getting used to the routine
a. Cafeteria
b. assembly
c. School bus
B. My early school days
</span><span>C. Early acquaintances
1. The playground
2. Friends and foes</span>
Unclear question, but I inferred you are referring to the article "Metamorphosis".
Answer:
C To show Gregor questioning his company and his loyalty to the job
Explanation:
Note, what we are told after the last rhetorical question; that the thoughts in the question had made Gregor upset than through any proper decision.
Thus, the questions shows that Gregor was questioning his company and his loyalty to the job.
okay so
One... when it comes to advertising and selling a product Marketers will try to target those who are not informed and with that it isn't ethical because with holding information is called omitting and which basically a form of lying. And lying is not an ethical thing.
Two...With holding certain information from a customer can be at risk to them. What if the product the marketer is selling such as a medication has negative side effects that the customer isn't made aware of and they end up going to the hospital for the side effect. It would not be very good ethics to with hold such important information especially knowing that someone's health could be at risk
For a counterclaim you could say that even though it could get you a sell it can come back to bite you in the but when they get a lawsuit handed to them. for withholding information and endangering the health of someone.
i hope that this helps some...
A: a source that’s cited in another source
