<span>A sudden influx of wealth from military action would throw off the balance of wealth in that, while other non-military people may have previously been wealthy, they would now no longer be wealthier than the soldiers who served them. With too much wealth, the value of money would also go down, causing the economy to actually decline. Also, with such an influx of wealth to the already wealthy, a larger rift would be created between the wealthy and the poor. That this wealth was accrued through military action would encourage more military action and more violence.</span>
Answers to #1:
Raphael Lemkin's definition of genocide was not accepted until after the Holocaust.
Raphael Lemkin had been studying the problem of mass killings of a people group since the 1920s, in regard to Turkish slaughter of Armenians in 1915. He coined the term "genocide" in 1944, in reference then also to the Holocaust. The term uses Greek language roots and means "killing of a race" of people. Lemkin served as an advisor to Justice Robert Jackson, the lead prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials. "Crimes against humanity" was the charge used at the Nuremberg trials, since no international legal definition of "genocide" had yet been accepted. Ultimately, Lemkin was able to persuade the United Nations to accept the definition of genocide and codify it into international law. In December, 1948, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which made use of a number of Lemkin's ideas on the subject.
#2: For item #2, you didn't ask a question, so I won't attempt to guess at what question you might have in mind. The definition as you quote it comes from Article II of the UN's Genocide Convention. Article III also indicts intention and conspiracy to commit genocide as crimes against international law. Article IV of that same Convention then puts teeth into the UN's action, saying, "Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals."
Answer:B
Explanation:with a ribbon on a stake of wood
Answer:
Because science, art and culture flourished
Explanation:
The Renaissance is a period of flourishing in the field of culture, science and art, which is characteristic for the period from the end of the 14th to the end of the 16th century. Higher availability of books and study of ancient writers gradually change people's awareness of themselves and the environment that surrounds them.
Numerous wars and an unstable political situation also reflected changes in the Catholic Church whose authority was shaken. Changes were also triggered by geographical discoveries, which, in addition to the exchange of cultures and the development of science, also encouraged eurocentrism, which led to the economic and therefore demographic recovery of the Old Continent at the expense of the New.
Most of the population lives in the countryside, but the population in cities is increasing rapidly. With the greater influx of wealth, the image of society changes with emergence of the middle class and by strengthening the influence of citizenship.
"Union leaders were assisting government leaders in corrupting society" is the one among the following choices given in the question that describes the <span>cartoonist's view about the effect that unionism was having on the United States. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option.</span>