Answer:
Comparative advantage
Explanation:
The reason is that Japan has less oportunity cost to manufacture cameras than US, so the Japanese companies has an advantage over US companies to compete not on efficiencies but on the cost of the product. Japanese camera won the US market very easily because the japanese camera costs very less to produce in Japan rather than in US. So the comparative advantage theory explains this trade of cameras in international trade with a better explanation.
Why should i ever care just kidding
Answer:
.D.complementary products
Explanation:
A complementary good is a product whose usage is dependent on the availability of another. Complementary goods are, therefore, goods that are used together. For example, A and B will be complimentary goods if the use of A will require the use of B.
Yachts and docks are complementary products because a yacht will require a dock as the base of its operation. Without a dock, yacht operations will be almost impossible. Bill is not making good sales on big yachts because potential customers cannot find sufficient docking space. Other examples of complementary goods are car and petrol, printers and ink cartridges, guns and bullets, and DVD players and DVD disks.
Answer:
Kaynaddi here is the answer of your question
The agent is not the owner of the apartment so he will not take care of the apartment, because he isn't supposed to pay the cost of fixing damages in the apartment. To mitigate this risk renter can be asked to pay a deposit which can be adjusted for any damages done in the apartment.
A provision in the lease agreement for the annual renewal allows an incentive for a renter who is long term. Doing so will help maintain leased apartment.
This is a key idea with international trade. This involves what is known as comparative advantage.
let's say country A can produce a ton of soybeans in 4 hours and a ton of corn in 2 hours. While country B can produce a ton of soybeans in 15 hours and a ton of corn in 5 hours.
Looking at this set up you can see that country A can produce both corn and soybeans faster, so they have an absolute advantage in both!
However what trade is based on is opportunity cost. So if we think about how much corn country A has to give up to produce soybeans, they have to divert a total of 4 hours from corn to soy beans to produce one ton of soy beans. That 4 hours could be used to produce 2 tons of corn (since 2 hours for 1 ton and we're taking away 4 hours!). So opportunity cost of soybeans in country A is 2 corn.
In country B they would need a total of 15 hours to produce one extra ton of soybeans, but those 15 hours could instead be used to produce 3 tons of corn (5 hours per ton and we're stealing 15 total hours). That means country B's opportunity cost is 3 corn.
Since A has a lower opportunity cost in produce soybeans they will specialize and B will specialize in corn.
