Answer: All of the above
Explanation: A leader can be defined as an individual who has the ability to persuade others to work as a group for performing a particular task.
An individual can demonstrate leadership by taking strict action on others and responsibilities on himself.
The given options in the question demonstrates strict actions and responsibility taking ability. Hence, the right option is D.
Answer:
E. efficiency wages
Explanation:
Clearly this isn't a discrimination case, as Rob has a robust background with the company (15 years). Although their work output may be the same, Rob's experience justifies the higher pay.
This is one form of efficiency wage theory, holding that higher wages lead to increased employee productivity. This way, Rob gets an incentive for staying with the company.
A money market account is the type of account is most suitable for Sofia’s needs.
A money market account earns interest on the money that is deposited at a higher rate than a normal savings account. Even though this is not a common savings account, the account holder is able to write checks from the account if the money needs to be accessed. A money market account is a 'best of both worlds' account because the holder can benefit like a savings and checking account would allow (with some restrictions).
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Sold product liability suit against the maker, alleging a design defect, the court may consider an available alternative design
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the core of the idea of faulty item configuration exemplified in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Product Liability is the accessibility of a sensible elective plan that could have diminished or kept away from the danger of mischief. In any case, a product might be defective, regardless of whether no sensible elective plan exists, if it neglects to give possible directions or warnings of a predictable danger of damage. An ongoing choice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court represents the use of these standards.
Answer:
$2 or 7.84%
Explanation:
we need to determine the expected value of the firm's payments:
- $35 x 50% chance of doing well = $17.50
- $20 x 50% chance of doing poorly = $10
- total expected value = $27.50
Since investors are willing to pay $25.50 and the expected value in one year is $27.50, the promised return = $27.50 - $25.50 = $2 or 7.84% (= $2 / $25.50)
