Answer and Explanation:
The two adjusting entries are as follows:
On May 31
Rent expense ($1,200,000 ÷ 5 months) $240,000
To Prepaid rent $240,000
(Being rent expense is recorded)
Here the rent expense is debited as it increased the expenses and credited the prepaid rent as it decreased the assets
On May 31
Unearned rent revenue Dr $148,800
To Ticket revenue $148,800
(Being unearned revenue is recorded)
Here the unearned rent revenue is debited as it decreased the liability and credited the ticket revenue as it increased the revenue
Answer:
The answer is: 2.514% in percentage term or $56,560 million in absolute term.
Explanation:
The entire population income of Dnalgne in the beggining of 1997 = Total population of Dnalgne in the beginning of 1997 x average annual income of a person in Dnalgne in the beginning of 1997 = 90 million x 25,000 = $2,250,000 million
The poplulation of Dnalgne at the end of 1997 = 90 million + 0.1 million = 90.1 million; The average annual income of a person in Dnalgne at the end of 1997 = 25,000 +600 = $25,600
The entire population income of Dnalgne in the end of 1997 = Total population of Dnalgne at the end of 1997 x average annual income of a person in Dnalgne at the end of 1997 = 90.1 million x 31,000 = $2,306,560 million
Thus. the rise in absolute number is $2,306,560 million - $2,250,000 million = $56,560 million or 56,560/2,250,000 = 2.514% in percentage term.
Answer:
Since the expected return and required return are different for both Stock X and Z, we say that they are not correctly priced
Explanation:
<em>To determine whether or not the stocks are correctly priced ,</em>
<em>we have to compare the r</em><em>equired return</em><em> and the </em><em>expected return on each of them.</em>
Required return = Rf +β (Rm-Rf)
Note that Rm-Rf is also known as market risk premium
<em>Stock Y Stock Z</em>
<em>Required return </em> 2.4% + 1.2(7.2%) 2.4% + 0.8(7.2%)
= 11% = 8.2%
<em>Expected return</em> <em>12.1% 7.85%</em>
Since the expected return and required return are different for both Stock X and Z, we say that they are not correctly priced
Answer: Old machine should be replaced.
Explanation:
The variable manufacturing cost will reduce by:
= 624,000 - 524,000
= $100,000
Over a period of 5 years this will be:
= 100,000 * 5
= $500,000
Selling the old machine would bring in $32,000:
= 500,000 + 32,000
= $532,000
The cost of the new machine would reduce this gross benefit by:
= 532,000 - 455,100
= $76,900
<em>Net income will increase by a total of $76,900 over the 5 year period if the new machine is bought so it should be bought. </em>
<span>Exporting has the least amount of risk. This is because the company is simply selling its wares to other businesses and consumers, without having to worry about licensing the product, getting permissions from other governments, or having to jump through loopholes to get the product in the hands of the intended audience.</span>
