by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer:
The same structure, in indirect or reported form, would be:
The principal will say that rules have to be followed at any cost.
Explanation:
<u>When reporting what someone said, we must change the verb tenses according to when the line was said. If there are any pronouns in the sentence, those may also need to be changed to match the speaker - for instance, if a man said something about himself, we should change "I" for "he". We also change time expressions, such as substituting "today" for "that day".</u>
<u>Not much changes in the sentence we are transforming here since the line inside the quotation marks does not present time expressions or pronouns. Another reason for that is the verb tense. Because it is "will say", which is a future, we do not have to change the verb tense inside the quotation marks.</u>
Just to make it clearer, imagine that the principal already said that: The principal said, "Rules have to be followed at any cost." Now the tense is in the past, "said". In this case, we should also change the tense inside the quotation marks. It would be: The principal said that rules had to be followed at any cost.
Answer:
Tweets (Twitter messages) describing the overthrow of Ben Ali at the time it happened.
Journal entries from a student describing how social media helped him join a protest
.
Quotations from experts on social media use during uprisings within the Arab world.
Explanation:
The given passage from "The Role of Social Media in the Arab Uprising" presents a claim by the authors that social media helped intensify the spread of the projection of Arab Uprising. Heather Brown, Emily Guskin, and Amy Mitchell present the claim that social media platforms allows greater coverage and spread awareness about the political turmoil.
Some pieces of evidence can help support their claim. First is the <u>tweet messages that describe the overthrow of Ben Ali when it happened</u>. This allows the electronic evidence that provides support to the claim. Moreover, a <u>student's journal entry that describes how he was influenced to join a protest through social media </u>and <u>experts' quotations on social media use during the turmoil </u>all help in providing validation to the claims made.
Thus, the <u>correct answers are the first, fourth and fifth options.</u>
Answer:
Selecting and forming a claim about a specific topic.
Identifying evidence to include to support your reasons.
Investigating counterclaims that go against your claim.
Explanation:
An argumentative essay is one that argues for or against any given issue. This means that the paper must include or contain evidence for the arguments made, support the claims, and thus, making a persuasive presentation.
In writing this type of essay, the prewriting steps will include the selection of the claim or argument that will be the focus. Then comes the identifying of evidence, as support for the argument. Also, investigating any counterclaims that argue against the claims made is also part of the prewriting steps.
Thus, the correct answers are the first, second, and third options.
