Hitler and Mussolini both used a number of physical and rhetorical tactics to appear powerful to their listeners. Both offered, in their aggressive use of body language and booming voices, a certain measure of machismo and confidence when delivering speeches. Both also appealed to the desires, fears, and needs of their listeners. Hitler and Mussolini, in addition, used historical examples--however faulty they might have been--to support their assertions.
It was to reward the workers with good wages and to put an end to the Solidarity Organization.
Answer:
Siberia has an abundant amount of farmland.
Explanation:
Given that the basic or primary means of living is based or dependent on the availability of food.
Therefore, the reason that best explains the fact that despite a part of northern Russia, to be one of the coldest places on Earth, with its frigid climate, over a quarter of the Russian population lives in this region is that "Siberia has an abundant amount of farmland."
<span>emotional but weak would be Mrs . Samsa
</span>
Unsympathetic and overbearing is Mr. Samsa.
Patient and forgiving - Gregor Samsa.
Compassionate yet distant is- Grete Samsa.
Not sure where the applied answers are but I have this it would be both
<span>His accusers’ rhetoric is clumsy and awkward.
His rhetoric is more deliberate and well thought out.</span>
