answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANTONII [103]
2 years ago
11

A recent article in Business Week listed the "Best Small Companies." We are interested in the current results of the companies'

sales and earnings. A random sample of 8 companies was selected and the sales and earnings, in millions of dollars, are reported below. Sales ($million) 89.2 18.6 18.2 71.7 58.6 46.8 17.5 11.9 Earnings ($million) 4.9 4.4 1.3 8 6.6 4.1 2.6 1.7 Let sales be the independent variable and earnings be the dependent variable. (i) Determine the estimated regression equation and comment on the coefficient of X. (ii) For a small company with $50.0 million in sales, estimate the earnings. (iii) Calculate the standard error of estimate and comment on it. (iv) Find the coefficient of determination and interpret the result.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Sindrei [870]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

(i) The estimated regression equation is;

\hat y ≈ 1.6896 + 0.0604·X

The coefficient of 'X' indicates that \hat y increase by a multiple of 0.0604 for each million dollar increase in sales, X

(ii) The estimated earnings for the company is approximately $4.7096 million

(iii) The standard error of estimate is approximately 29.34

The high standard error of estimate indicates that individual mean do not accurately represent the population mean

(iv) The coefficient of determination is approximately 0.57925

The coefficient of determination indicates that the probability of the coordinate of a new point of data to be located on the line is 0.57925

Step-by-step explanation:

The given data is presented as follows;

\begin{array}{ccc}Sales \ (\$million)&&Earning \ (\$million) \\89.2&&4.9\\18.6&&4.4\\18.2&&1.3\\71.7&&8\\58.6&&6.6\\46.8&&4.1\\17.5&&2.6\\11.9&&1.7\end{array}

(i) From the data, we have;

The regression equation can be presented as follows;

\hat y = b₀ + b₁·x

Where;

b₁ = The slope given as follows;

b_1 = \dfrac{\Sigma(x_i - \overline x) \cdot (y_i - \overline y)}{\Sigma(x_i - \overline x)^2}

b₀ = \overline y - b₁·\overline x

From the data, we have;

{\Sigma(x_i - \overline x) \cdot (y_i - \overline y)} = 364.05

\Sigma(x_i - \overline x)^2} = 6,027.259

\overline y = 4.2

\overline x = 41.5625

∴ b₁ = 364.05/6,027.259 ≈ 0.06040059005

b₀ = 4.2 - 0.06040059005 × 41.5625 ≈ 1.68960047605 ≈ 1.69

Therefore, we have the regression equation as follows;

\hat y ≈ 1.6896 + 0.0604·X

The coefficient of 'X' indicates that the earnings increase by a multiple of 0.0604 for each million dollar increase in sales

(ii) For the small company, we have;

X = $50.0 million, therefore, we get;

\hat y = 1.6896 + 0.0604 × 50 = 4.7096

The estimated earnings for the company, \hat y = 4.7096 million

(iii) The standard error of estimate, σ, is given by the following formula;

\sigma =\sqrt{\dfrac{\sum \left (x_i-\mu  \right )^{2} }{n - 1}}

Where;

n = The sample size

Therefore, we have;

\sigma =\sqrt{\dfrac{6,027.259 }{8 - 1}} \approx 29.34

The standard error of estimate, σ ≈ 29.34

The high standard error of estimate indicates that it is very unlikely that a given mean value within the data is a representation of the true population mean

(iv) The coefficient of determination (R Square) is given as follows;

R^2 = \dfrac{SSR}{SST}

Where;

SSR = The Sum of Squared Regression ≈ 21.9884

SST = The total variation in the sample ≈ 37.96

Therefore, R² ≈ 21.9884/37.96 ≈ 0.57925

The coefficient of determination, R² ≈ 0.57925.

Therefore, by the coefficient of determination, the likelihood of a new introduced data point to located on the line is 0.57925

You might be interested in
Labrador Retriever weighs 48 kg after a diet and exercise program the dog weighs 43 kilograms to determine if this shows a perce
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer:

percentage change in weight ≈ 10%

Step-by-step explanation:

The dog weighed 48 kg after a diet and after an exercise program the dog had a weight of 43 kg. This means the dog loss weight since the dog weight decreased from an initial value of 48 kg to 43 kg. The decrease in weight can be calculate as

decrease in weight = original weight - new weight

original weight  = 48 kg

new weight = 43 kg

decrease in weight = 48 - 43 = 5 kg

Since the weight decrease their will be a percentage decrease in weight.

% decrease = decrease in weight/original weight × 100

% decrease = 5/48 × 100

% decrease = 500/48

% decrease = 10. 42666666667

percentage change in weight ≈ 10%

5 0
2 years ago
What is the multiplicative rate of change for the exponential function f(x) = f start bracket x end bracket equals two start bra
jeka94

Answer:

The multiplicative rate of change is \dfrac{2}{5}.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are given the function

f(x)=2\cdot \left(\dfrac{5}{2}\right)^{-x}

First, use the following property of exponents

\left(\dfrac{a}{b}\right)^{-x}=\left(\dfrac{b}{a}\right)^{x}

So, your function is

f(x)=2\cdot \left(\dfrac{2}{5}\right)^{x}

If the exponential function is written in the form

f(x)=a\cdot b^x,

then b is the multiplicative rate of change for this exponential function.

In your case, the multiplicative rate of change is \dfrac{2}{5}.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The results of a mathematics placement exam at two different campuses of Mercy College follow: Campus Sample Size Sample Mean Po
Leona [35]

Answer:

z=\frac{(33-31)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{8^2}{330}+\frac{7^2}{310}}}}=3.37  

p_v =P(Z>3.37)=1-P(Z  

Comparing the p value with a significance level for example \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the mean for the Campus 1 is significantly higher than the mean for the group 2.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given

Campus   Sample size     Mean    Population deviation

   1                 330               33                      8

   2                310                31                       7

\bar X_{1}=33 represent the mean for sample 1  

\bar X_{2}=31 represent the mean for sample 2  

\sigma_{1}=8 represent the population standard deviation for 1  

\sigma_{2}=7 represent the population standard deviation for 2  

n_{1}=330 sample size for the group 1  

n_{2}=310 sample size for the group 2  

\alpha Significance level provided  

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean for Campus 1 is higher than the mean for Campus 2, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis:\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\leq 0  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu_{1} - \mu_{2}> 0  

We have the population standard deviation's, and the sample sizes are large enough we can apply a z test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{(\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{\sigma^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}} (1)  

z-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.  

With the info given we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{(33-31)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{8^2}{330}+\frac{7^2}{310}}}}=3.37  

P value  

Since is a one right tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(Z>3.37)=1-P(Z  

Comparing the p value with a significance level for example \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the mean for the Campus 1 is significantly higher than the mean for the group 2.  

5 0
2 years ago
In the book Essentials of Marketing Research, William R. Dillon, Thomas J. Madden, and Neil H. Firtle discuss a research proposa
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation  

X_{1}=25 represent the number of homeowners who would buy the security system

X_{2}=9 represent the number of renters who would buy the security system

n_{1}=140 sample 1

n_{2}=60 sample 2

p_{1}=\frac{25}{140}=0.179 represent the proportion of homeowners who would buy the security system

p_{2}=\frac{9}{60}= 0.15 represent the proportion of renters who would buy the security system

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the two proportions differs , the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{25+9}{140+60}=0.17  

Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.179-0.15}{\sqrt{0.17(1-0.17)(\frac{1}{140}+\frac{1}{60})}}=0.500  

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided \alpha, but we can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>0.500)=0.617  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15 always p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the two proportions NOT differs significantly.  

6 0
2 years ago
In a camp there is food for 400 persons for 23 days-if 60 more persons join the camp find the number of days the provision will
Deffense [45]

The answer is 20 days.

After 60 people have joined there will be 460 people in the camp.

The number of days which the provisions will last will be proportional less after the 60 people have joined and will be:-

(400/460) * 23

= (20 / 23) * 23

=  20


3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following names the figure in the diagram below?
    13·2 answers
  • Jessica is selling books during the summer to earn money for college. She earns a commission on each sale but has to pay for her
    12·2 answers
  • Factor the GCF: −6x4y5 − 15x3y2 + 9x2y3
    10·1 answer
  • ∠A and ​ ∠B ​ are vertical angles with m∠A=x and m∠B=4x−30 .<br><br> What is m∠A ?
    7·1 answer
  • Kristen owns 61 shares of Prince Waste Collection and 45 shares of Nar Heating/Cooling. Nar Heating/Cooling is worth $7.88 per s
    5·2 answers
  • A zookeeper is monitoring the population of birds. The flock needs to have exactly three times more females than males to thrive
    9·1 answer
  • Samuel wants to buy at least twice as many graphic novels as comic books, Comic books sell for $7 each, and graphic
    11·2 answers
  • Sketch the region enclosed by the given curves. Decide whether to integrate with respect to x or y. Draw a typical approximating
    11·1 answer
  • Supervisor: "I am giving you 10 business days to make a 4% improvement on your average quality score. Your current average quali
    8·1 answer
  • A teacher plans to buy air fresheners that cost $3.50 each. If the teacher can spend no more than $10 on the air fresheners and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!