Answer:
The hexadecimal equivalent of the encrypted A is C2
Explanation:
Given
Encrypted binary digit of A = 11000010
Required
Hexadecimal equivalent of the encrypted binary digit.
We start by grouping 11000010 in 4 bits
This is as follows;
1100 0010
The we write down the hexadecimal equivalent of each groupings
1100 is equivalent to 12 in hexadecimal
So, 1100 = 12 = C
0010 is represented by 2 in hexadecimal
So, 0010 = 2
Writing this result together; this gives
1100 0010 = C2
Going through the conversion process;
A is first converted to binary digits by shifting a point to the left
A => 11000010
11000010 is then converted to hexadecimal
11000010 = C2
Conclusively, the hexadecimal equivalent of the encrypted A is C2
Answer:
10
Explanation:
you start with 5 5
you add 3 8
the variable is not odd so skip 8
the variable is even so add 1 9
the variable is odd so add 1 10
10
hope this helps <3
<u>Paired programming:</u>
Paired programming is a new technique where one person gets one another to<em> write the code</em>. Here one will write the code and other will start verifying as the type.
So we might think it is waste to employ two person for same task but it is not so. There are many <em>benefits in incorporating this technique</em>. Let us see those benefits one by one.
- <em>Inter-personal skill gets improved
</em>
- <em>Lower amount of coding mistake
</em>
- <em>Learn from each other
</em>
- <em>Peer review enhance collaboration
</em>
Challenges expect to arise during pair-programming
-
Two heads are superior to one. On the off chance that the driver experiences a <em>hitch with the code</em>, there will be two of them who'll take care of the issue.
- Builds up your <em>staff's relational aptitudes</em>. Working together on a solitary venture encourages your group to welcome the estimation of <em>correspondence and collaboration. </em>
Overcome Method
The most ideal approach to move <em>toward blending</em> is to accomplice two software engineers and have them share a PC. The pair ought to have the option to choose how to part the work, and it is prudent that they should <em>switch jobs frequently.</em>
Answer:
I'd go with the 2nd one
If it heats up more & more, then it's lifespan will be shortened more & more. The more it heats up, the less durability it has.
<span>A chess-playing computer program that routinely calculates all possible outcomes of all possible game moves best illustrates problem solving by means of </span>brute force.