We need to assign a value for x to check the possible values of y.
1st inequality: y < -0.75x
X = - 1 ; y < -0.75(-1) ; y < 0.75 possible coordinate (-1,0.75) LOCATED AT THE 2ND QUADRANT
X = 0 ; y < -0.75(0) ; y < 0 possible coordinate (0,0) ORIGIN
X = 1 ; y < -0.75(1) ; y < -0.75 possible coordinate (1,-0.75) LOCATED AT THE 4TH QUADRANT
2nd inequality: y < 3x -2
X = -1 ; y < 3(-1) – 2 ; y < -5 possible coordinate (-1,-5) LOCATED AT THE 4TH QUADRANT
X = 0 ; y < 3(0) – 2 ; y < -2 possible coordinate (0,-2) LOCATED AT THE 4TH QUADRANT
X = 1 ; y < 3(1) – 2 ; y <<span> 1 possible coordinate (1,1) LOCATED AT THE 1ST QUADRANT
The actual solution to the system lies on the 4TH QUADRANT.
</span>
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that
Initial value problem
, y(3)=4
Substitute the value 
When t=3 and y=4 then
z=3+4=7

Differentiate z w.r.t t
Then, we get



Integrate on both sides


Substitute t=3 and z=7
Then, we get




Substitute the value of C then we get






Since the margin of error is 5%, the minimum of supporters will be less than the maximum of disapprovers.
So the third option will be correct. You cannot make certain conclusions based on this survey.
First of all you have to find the missing measurements. The actual measurements for the angles in the hexagon are not given, but they give you an expression. You have to solve for x first so that you can plug it in and find the angle measurement. You have to equal the two sides that are given to you like this: 20x+48=33x+9. You solve for x and then plug it into each angle measurement. This should give you 108. Since it is a regular hexagon all of the sides are equal. If you look at the angle at the top of the hexagon you'll see two triangles and the angle. Since it lies on a straight line, it is all equal to 180. You already have the angle measurement of the hexagon and are missing the triangles. So 180-108=72. 72 is the missing part of the angle. You divide this by 2 in order to find each triangle angle measurements. the answer is 36 degrees.
Answer:
4. A) 
3. A) 
2. D) 
1. C) 
Step-by-step explanation:
4. Two families combined have <em>at</em><em> </em><em>least</em><em> </em>3 pets.
3. $1500 is your result, so everything else is straightforward simple, knowing that the keywords <em>at</em><em> </em><em>least</em><em> </em>$1500<em> </em>mean <em>greater</em><em> </em><em>than</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>equal</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em>$1500.
2. Find the correspondents, then determine what inequality to use. In this case, you will use <em>less than</em><em> </em><em>or equal</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em>because overpaying is UNNECESSARY.
1. <em>Eight</em><em> </em><em>dollars</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>pizza</em><em> </em>and <em>twelve</em><em> </em><em>dollars</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>pizza</em><em> </em>is <em>12x</em><em> </em>and <em>8x</em>.<em> </em>The rest is straightforward simple because you now have your <em>initial</em><em> </em><em>costs</em><em> </em>of <em>$</em><em>45</em><em> </em>and <em>$</em><em>5</em>,<em> </em>and the exercise tells you that the total charge for Company A is <em>less than</em> the total charge for Company B, therefore you have your answer.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.