In Amy’s article on ¨Why investing in fast-food may be a good thing¨ the two points where she might have given way to accusation or blame are the following…
Although we favor local, organic food, we recognize it isn't available in every community, and is often priced above the means of the average household. Many of us live more than 100 miles from a working farm.
The fact that she mentions that it is often 'priced above the means of the average household' may dismiss the movement as elitist.
She finds common ground and promotes civil discourse with her audience immediately in the following paragraph by stating this fact:
Fast food is a way of life. In America, the average person eats it more than 150 times a year. In 2007, sales for the 400 largest U.S.-based fast-food chains totaled $277 billion, up 7 percent from 2006.
Fast food is a global phenomenon. Major chains and their local competitors open restaurants in nearly every country. For instance, in Greece, burgers and pizza are supplanting the traditional healthy Mediterranean diet of fish, olive oil and vegetables. Doctors are treating Greek children for diabetes, high cholesterol and high blood pressure—ailments rarely seen in the past.
The fast-food industry won't go away anytime soon. But in the meantime, it can be changed. And because it's so enormous, even seemingly modest changes can have a big impact. In 2006, New York City banned the use of trans-fats (a staple of fast food) in restaurants, and in 2008, California became the first state to do so. When McDonald's moved to non-trans fats for making French fries, the health benefits were widespread.
We can also appreciate her point in the conclusion of the article:
While my heart will always be with Slow Food, I recognize the fast-food industry can improve and that some companies are ahead of others on that path.
The answer in the space provided is the corporate culture. It
is because the organization is being defined base on the values, norms or behavior
that each employee shows in the working environment and by that it has a strong
influence towards their organization.
The answer is:
A. national export initiative
The national export initiative was a program put to work durign the Obama administration that aimed to double the number and value of exportations that America did by 2014, it was a complex and strong effort by the federal government and several other organizations thru promotion and intergovernmental cooperation, this helped support 2 million domestic jobs.
Answer:
As consumer phycology is the study of how or why people buy things or goods, it is a useful tool to seek what are the patterns that potential customers are likely to follow aiming to sell the bank services such as bank runs.
Explanation:
By using the influence of marketing, and external stimuli to convince possible clients to purchase, based on studies and their findings, which can help banks marketing executives to figure out how to sell the product or what is the most likely population to work on based on their preferences in order to offer different options to the costumers that can adapt to their needs.
Answer:
the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
Explanation:
This is because, Collectivist-inclined totalitarian states will favour the practice and principle of giving preference to group over individuals in terms of government activities, which in this case, reflected in the government enacting laws that severely restrict private enterprises. While democracy through its principles and established practices, favours individualism, such as private enterprises and pro consumers. This shows that, the legal framework of a country reflects the rulers' dominant political ideology.
