Dear Principal.
I come through this letter to emphasize attitudes that should be discouraged in our students and encouraged in our teachers, to make the learning process in our school more effective and strengthened, in addition to making the school life more harmonious.
In relation to students, I believe it would be beneficial if the practice of sitting, or even lying down, in the library corridors were prohibited. I have seen that many students tend to do this type of activity, which impairs the circulation of people in the library and can even cause accidents that put both the students and the library's collection at risk. A second practice among students that should be avoided is the use of calculators during classes that involve calculations. This should be avoided because, although the calculator is an efficient tool, it prevents students from being able to understand the calculation and exact it.
Among teachers, I believe it is important to encourage patience, as some of them have been a little impatient when complex concepts are not quickly understood by students. I also believe that they should encourage students to take more notes, as I have noticed that students learn more by copying than by receiving class material by email, or by handouts.
Thank you for your time and ask you to take my recommendations into account.
Graciously,
Mary Smith.
Senior Prefect
Answer:
Paraphasing in the above text is incorrect.
Explanation:
Whenever you paraphrase your text, it is necessary that, after the paragraph ends, you reference the source where you found the idea presented. This reference must be placed in parentheses, where you will put the author's last name and the year of publication of the source.
In the example above, although the individual who wrote the paraphrase had the intention of referring to the source where he found this idea, the reference was presented incorrectly, making the paraphrase a plagiarism.
<span>LIFE WAS RAPIDLY CHANGING FOR INDIAN FARMERS DURING THE TIME NECTAR IN A SIEVE WAS WRITTEN. THE EXPANSION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL AND INDUSTRIALIZATION INTRUDED TRAGICALLY ON THEIR TRADITIONAL FARMING LIFESTYLE. TRADITIONAL INDIAN LIVING INCLUDED TRADING CROPS, THIS HOW THEY CREATED AN INCOME, AND HOW THEY SUSTAINED THEIR LIFESTYLE; IT WAS ALL THEY KNEW. SO WHEN GREATER GOVERNMENTAL CONTROL EXPANDED TO INDIA, AND INDUSTRIALIZATION EXPANDED. THINGS STARTED HAPPENING LIKE GOVERNMENT SEIZING FARMERS LAND. WITHOUT THIS LAND FARMERS WERE NOT ABLE TO GROW AND PRODUCE CROPS TO SALE OR TRADE FOR THE THINGS THEY NEEDED TO SURVIVE. INCLUDING LESS FOOD TO EAT. SO FARMERS WERE STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE AS ALL THESE NEW WAYS OF LIFE WERE INTRUDING ON THEIR TRADITIONAL LIFESTYLES, AND BECAUSE THE AGRICULTURE WAY OF LIFE WAS ALL THEY WERE TAUGHT IN WAS HARD FOR FARMERS TO ADAPT TO THE NEW INDUSTRIALIZED CHANGES. THE BOOK FOLLOWS ONE PERSONAL STORY OF A FARMER AND HIS PERSONAL STRUGGLE WITH ADAPTING TO THE CHANGING WORLD AROUND HIM. AS WELL AS IT IMPACTED HIS FAMILY AND THE ADDED STRESS THIS MADE ON LIFE.</span>
