Answer:
Sarcasm indeed can be confusing.
Explanation:
Sarcasm indeed can be confusing to some extent. Sarcasm can be understood as "indirect criticism", what you say manifest exactly the oposite of what you really mean with the comment.
Sarcasm cannot be prevented, it is a very "human" activity due to the high symbolism, and complexities of human interaction, sarcasm is expected to exist in one way or another.
Yes, the continuing comments in the U.S about fake news may have something to do with the country's growingly "autistic" impatience with sarcasm and criticism.
Answer:
the body of the review
Explanation:
Literature review consists of reviewing textual media such as articles, books, journals, conference proceedings, among other media composed of texts, regardless of which the review will evaluate the construction of the text and the exposure of ideas and arguments important for that media and for the purpose intended by the author.
The literature review is basically composed of three parts, an introduction (where the basic, general and introductory information of the text are analyzed), the body of the review (where the different ideas and the different sources used to compose them are evaluated) and the conclusion (where resolutions are made of everything that has been written and evaluated).
I'd choose dark, inaccessible, and comfortless. The other words don't really pin down the tone ("draperies"? "General"?).
class's = owned by one class.
classes's = owned by multiple classes. (usually shortened to classes')
You can't shorter class's so class', however. Here's why:
<em>You can only shorten it when it's a plural noun that ends in an s or when it's a proper noun (names, places) that ends in an s.
</em><em>
</em>So unless there's more than one class, it's class's.<em>
</em>
