The largest overall increase in population would need to have a high birthrate, and a low death rate. Meaning more people are being born, and not many people are dying!
Answer:
The benefits of having animal farm.
Explanation:
Animal farm is a farm where animals is reared in order to take useful things from them. There are a lot of benefits which should be taken from the animal farm. First, animal farm provides meat in large amount which is good source of protein. It also provide dairy products such as milk, yogurt and cheese etc which also a good source of protein and fats. The animal dung which we called farm yard manure is also a cheap and good source of fertilizer used for the growing of field crops and vegetables. So it is clear that animal farm has a great importance in our society.
The Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF) is a curve that shows all the combinations of two goods that an economy or a firm are able to produce given a certain endownment of factors of production. The points in the curve show all the efficient production combinations, as there are no unused resources and, in order to produce a larger quantity of one of the goods, a certain amount of the other needs to be given up.
Assume that the PPF attached is the one corresponding to my new store, where I can produce either guns or butter. Any bundle located along the curve (for example, the combinations B, D or C) represents efficent amounts of production of the two goods, and therefore any of them are recomendable production strategies that can be followed. Those are efficient combinations because the whole endowment of resources is used. In opposition, point A is inefficient because there are unused resources in the firm/economy, and point X is impossible, because there are not enough resources in the economy to generate those levels of output.
D. Can propose amendments to the Constitution to overturn a Supreme Court decision
Judging by the opinion, if the students in Tinker v. Des Moines had done more than wear black armbands and had instead engaged in "disruptive" speech that got in the way of their classmates learning, they likely would have been ruled against. This is the type of analysis that the Court had to do in cases like the infamous "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case wherein a student relayed that message during a school event.