Answer:
Critical thinking is a considered reflection on whether one should accept or reject a statement or postpone a judgment on it and with how much certainty one should accept or reject it.
Critical thinking applies equally to opinion formation and decision-making. It takes into account testimony, experience and arguments and often includes the interpretation and evaluation of testimonies, arguments and information and their context and importance, as well as the assessment of what criteria or methodology is appropriate to decide the case. Critical thinking relies not only on reasoning but also on accuracy, clear thinking and fairness as appropriate.
Therefore, critical thinking has three fundamental components: analysis (for example, the analysis of a supposed truth), criticism (the counteracting of said supposed truth against the values defended by those who think critically) and the foundation (the defense of the personal values of those who think critically).
Paine first wrote about the relationship between society and government
and how a government's efficacy could be judged only on its ability to
protect the liberty and property of its citizens. He argued that the
government laid out in the English constitution failed to do this.
Next,
Paine argued against the concept of monarchy and hereditary succession.
He used the Bible to illustrate God's condemnation of monarchies. Then
he argued that America no longer needed England's help, and that because
England had attacked its colonies, it was no longer deserving of their
loyalties. He wrote that American commerce would be better off without
England's help. He proposed a government of representative democracy.
Finally, he discussed America's military strength and potential.
Once
published "Common Sense" was amazingly popular. In 1776 it sold about
150,000 copies. George Washington ordered the pamphlet read to all his
troops. According to Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Gordon S. Wood,
"Common Sense" was "the most incendiary and popular pamphlet of the
entire revolutionary era."
Hope I helped
:D
As the Bloody Sunday, as the 1905 Revolution was named, was a turmoil of the people of Russia calling for a change in their government as a result of all the wrong decisions made by the czars, if I could go back in time to avoid such a massacre I would urge czar Nicholas II to grant basic rights to the population, to grant citizens the most basic civil liberties, to bridge the gap between the lower class of the population and the feudal lords who still owned the vast majority of lands farmed by peasants and I will also advice him to provide better labor conditions for all the labor force. Thus, I would expect a society with a better lifestyle, whose rights were respected and fulfilled, the wellbeing of the workers at work place, a better economy for worker class, so that they would not need to lead to uprisings to protest, and call for changes. In a result, the great massacre could be avoided.
Answer:
Maybe where the person got there information from. Whether the source was reliable or not. She could also see if the dates of events and citations are truly impacting your writing.
Explanation:
