Answer:
They were helpful to America in the war, and Roosevelt felt they shouldn't be discriminated against.
Explanation:
Remember, the African-American soldiers also called Buffalo Soldiers at the time were victims of prejudice even right there in military camps.
So, Roosevelt's famous quote was like a thank you message for their assistance; in a sense telling them that they are free to mingle together.
Answer:
Carnegie called for treating the workers kindly. “When relations with workers go beyond the letter of the contract, it is always beneficial for the enterprise. Nothing has served the enterprise more than the good attitude of the workers," Carnegie claimed.
The only benefit brought to mankind is the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy to produce it. In addition, without wealth there can be no Philanthropist. When providing charity, the main consideration should be the desire to help those who then help themselves; give part of the necessary funds by which those who wish to grow will receive this opportunity; provide assistance to those who want to succeed so that they can achieve this. To help only occasionally and never making everything possible. Neither the individual nor the whole of humanity are better off by alms. Worthy help, with rare exceptions, does not require it. Really valuable representatives of humanity never do this, apart from emergencies or sudden changes. These were beliefs of Carnegie.
Explanation:
Both the Grangers and the Farmers' Alliance found it difficult to Stand together on national issues.
Option A
<u>Explanation</u>:
Farmer's alliance was an American agricultural movement of 1870s which sought to improve the farmer's economic conditions. Farmer's also formed an organisation, the northern alliance called the Granger movement.
Both the farmer's alliance and the Granger found it so tough to stand together on national issues. The Granger were known as the patrons of husbandry. This organisation was formed in 1867 to support better methods of agriculture. The main aim of both of them was to improve the working conditions and lives of the farmers. They both have very clear motives.
Answer: Candidates would spend way more than the limit in every state.
Explanation: The richest person would most likely win the election because they could spend more on their campaign.