Answer:
Option A net worth -215,906.03
Option B net worth -210, 159.75
It is a better deal to use the machine through lease than purchase it as the net worth is lower.
Explanation:
Purchase the machine:
-164,000 purchase cost
PV of the maintenance cost
C -9,000.00
time 10
rate 0.08
PV -$60,390.7326
PV of the salvage value
Maturity 14,000.00
time 10.00
rate 0.08000
PV 6,484.7088
<em>net worth: </em>
-162,000 - 60,390.73 + 6,484.70 = -215,906.03
PV of the lease: (annuity-due)
C 29,000.00
time 10
rate 0.08
PV $210,159.7494
Answer:
a. Amount of operating expenses recognized during the accounting period = Account payable closing balance + Cash payment - Opening balance
= $25,000 + $40,000 - $2,000
= $63,000
b. Net income earned during the accounting period = Cash revenue - Amount of operating expenses recognized
= $85,000 - $63,000
= $22,000
C. Amount of cash flow from operating activities = Net income + Increase in current liability
= $22,000 + ($25,000 - $2,000)
= $45,000
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.