I will write about my favorite sport, soccer, I hope that it works as a model for you.
"In this short essay, we are going to discuss why soccer is mu favorite sport.
Basically a game of soccer has 2 teams playing against each other,each team has 11 players and others for substitution, the aim is to score goals by putting the ball within the opponent's nets, the goal.
The game is challenging as players cannot use their hands to conduce the ball, only the goalkeeper within his area can do so. If a player receives the ball and he is located before only one player before reaching the goal the move is cancelled as offside, so teams have to plan how to pass the ball and the right moment to run towards the goal.
Sometimes the game can get violent because of the full concact players have, if something illegal happens, a player may get a yellow card, if recurrent or something more violent happens the player gets a red card and is sent out of the game, there is no substitution for this player and the team has to play with fewer people.
In conclusion, the game is challenging and has a great deal of strategy and dynamics."
Answer:
The answer to the question: What is the author´s purpose for including this statement, would be: To show the greatness, and yet the simplicity, of the innovations and discoveries that this researcher, Terry Sejnowski accomplished, regarding learning, on many fields, including language mastering. This neuroscientist, better known as Terrence Joseph Sejnowki, has been known around the world for his work on neural circuits, and other things regarding how the brain works, especially when it comes to learning, and mastering different fields of knowledge. What he showed through his multiple research is that learning is much simpler than it was used to believe, and it required the correct work of a neural circuit. He found that this neural circuit was the only thing necessary to ensure proper learning, and that is what the author in "Talking Robots" wanted to express through this excerpt.
The answer is D
All the others are opinions
Yeats states that he was not closely acquainted with the people in the Easter Rising. He acknowledges that he only exchanged pleasantries with them before the uprising. He also indicates that he has personal reasons for disliking one person. So he is writing about the cause for which they stood, which, by inference, is important.
The comparison of the rebels to "stone" suggests that Yeats may have viewed the rebels' attitude as inflexible or not adapted to the changing times. Yeats also acknowledges the possibility that their deaths may have been "needless" because the British might keep their promises.
However, his reference to the "sacrifice" (of all who had supported Irish independence) and the rebels' "excess of love" suggest that he views their cause in a positive light. Moreover, Yeats's repeated description of the kind of change that the uprising has brought about as "a terrible beauty" suggests that his sympathies lie with the rebels.
To summarize, Yeats places a certain distance between the rebels and himself, but he supports the rebels' cause.
It is B) He is considered to be an outsider. i got it right on my exam
