The question above is incomplete, the complete version is given below:
Read this excerpt from
"Not a Dove, But No Longer a Hawk."
I wonder, when I look at the
bombed out peasant hamlets, the orphans begging and stealing on the streets of
Saigon and the women and children with napalm burns lying on the hospital cots,
whether the United States or any nation has the right to inflict this suffering
and degradation on another people for its own ends.<span>
How do the allusions in this excerpt reinforce the meaning of the passage?</span>
The allusions clarify the geographic locations visited by the
author.
The allusions recall specific locations and horrors of the
Vietnam conflict.
The allusions question the Vietnamese for allowing such a
violent war.
<span>The allusions criticize the political philosophies that
encourage suffering.</span>
<span>ANSWER</span>
The correct option is this: THE ALLUSION CRITICIZE THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES THAT ENCOURAGE SUFFERING. Allusion is a figure of speech, which refers to an object or a circumstance from an external context. In the passage given above, the author is questioning the political morality behind war. War usually result in great suffering for all involved and the author is wondering, if is morally correct for countries to be settling their differences by mean of warfare.
I'm not sure what you read or what this question is really about, but I'm guessing the answer would have something to do with him making the character relatable and applies to everyone who reads it. Maybe the reader is able to see some of themselves in the traits of the character?
Just like word choice, writers<span> should strive to vary their </span>sentence<span> structure to create rhythmic prose and keep their reader interested. </span>Sentences<span> that require a variation often repeat subjects, lengths, or types.
</span>
Chaucer uses several different techniques to create lively characters, but the best option from the list would be
"indirect characterization" if you have to choose one.
Explanation:
In The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer originally uses indirect techniques of characterization in identifying the various pilgrims in the General Prologue and completely the whole poem. Unlike primary characterization in which the narrator simply tells the reader what sort of personality a role has, secondary characterization allows the reader to form his or her own conception of the character in question
It's D, since both have ed's, while other sentences combine ed's and ing's. They have to have the same ending. I hope this helps!
