Storage of food was important.
Wine and meat needed to be stored apart.
Most yeomen had vats and presses to make cheese
Answer:
The word choice helps develop the poem because shes is explaining something if u closely listen she/ he is talking about a voice that is telling people about a life time and about love and everything else.She also describes voice and love in the story and other people's voices so that they can be herd because most people aren't herd and she wants people to be herd so that people know who and what there voices mean and what they are She says that those are the voices or 3 or 2 people who need to be herd sometimes.
Explanation:
Answer:
She felt proud and also felt closer to her own heritage and home.
Explanation:
<em>Montreal 1962</em> is a short story by Shauna Singh Baldwin, recollecting her first experience of being a Sardar's wife in a foreign land. She recounts how her husband was asked to remove his hair and turban to be employed.
The short story delves into how she, as a Sardar's wife, felt about her husband's predicament on being asked to be 'normal' like the Canadians and get rid of his natural identity- the turban and his hair and be clean-shaven. While her husband was out working, she took upon herself to wash and then work on even trying to tie a turban, like her husband and others must have done before her. And in the process, she began to understand the significance and even the cultural significance of the turban. She felt that it is what makes them “them”, declaring that she will not let their tradition and culture be taken away from them.
She came to the realization of the turban's significance in their lives and decides to stand by him no matter what happens. She will work for her hands and help him to tie his turban, and then she <em>"will have taught Canadians what it takes to wear a turban".
</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
A. words and actions
Explanation:
you don't see Han's thoughts nor feelings, but the text shows what he is saying and what he is doing.
Answer:
I think its B
Explanation:
since a professor has already written books on the production of food he should be well prepared for writing an article. People who already write have a better ability to grab a reader's attention.
the tv reporter has only visited a single fast food museum, so he wouldn't have much to write on.
the former worker is already mad at being fired (he would write negatively about the place) and only has knowledge about meat. (in my opinion)
the senator could be a good option but his field is law not writing.
hope this helps :-)