Answer:
C. Symbolic-interaction approach
Explanation:
Symbolic-interaction approach is the sociological perspective which would mostly likely support the provision of equal opportunities to male and females in the United States.
<em>This is because, the approach talks about the usefulness of both the male and female in the society as well as its symbolic interaction which exist between them.</em>
<span>Chef Anna taught us to prepare French recipes with her traditional techniques.
The term techniques in the above sentence means A. SPECIAL METHODS.
Because of the phrase "her traditional techniques", Chef Anna owned the process of preparing French recipes. It is uniquely hers and shows her special methods of showing how things are done.</span>
Answer:
The metaphor "were a coat of armor"highlights the protection black students needed during the school integration
Explanation:
A metaphor typically is used as a figure of speech to pass expression in a statement. Such expressions when considered on the surface do not speak to the issue on ground but do have implied meanings and can be easily interpreted.
An example used alot by teenagers in school is "the test was a breeze". Breeze and test obviously don't go hand in hand, but breeze in this instance gives expression to '"ease, simple, not a problem" about the test.
And in this question, we see the 70s and periods before then was a tense one for black integration. The opposition against the integration of the Blacks was obvious thus the court demanded some level of protection. The Police being drafted in to take on that responsibility was a great confidence booster that minimized the fear faced by Black students; hence that protective layer from the police can be described as a coat of armor. Remember a coat of armor is steel and Iron, it repels pellets, sword attacks and rocks hauled at it.
Answer:
All the sea was like a cauldron
Explanation:
That is the correct as because it compares something using like or as
Ani says that Dan Deluca wrote an article that contradicts his stance of the Nobel being well deserved at times, the two sentences of said article that show this kind of contradiction are:
Many of Dylan’s most fervently loved songs—some of which actually are love songs—date from the 1960s, and his being honored at age 75 can be seen as an ultimate affirmation for the baby boomer generation.
and
And it’s a good thing [his lyrics] have been published, because if you’ve gone to see the famously sneering and syllable-garbling Dylan play live in recent years, you probably couldn’t understand a word he was singing.
this is because they say that the Nobel might be a product of simple nostalgia and they undermine Dylan as an artist, plus these seem to not be quotes from detractors but something Dan DeLuca is saying himself
