Answer:
The connection that the author draws between wealth and power in Rome’s democratic society is the following.
Explanation:
The text "Athens vs. Rome," written by Chaddie Kruger, is addressed here. In the book, Kruger compares the two nations in that they battled in Athens to overthrow dictatorship, meanwhile the Romans overthrew the King in Rome to create the Roman Republic. The speaker often compared the roman senate to the Athenian boule. In Rome, the people did not participate explicitly in spite of the freedom to participate.
Answer:Appalachian Plateau
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The factor that most promoted the spread of ideas and products from the ancient river valley civilization of Egypt and Mesopotamia to the Greek and Roman, was trade relationships.
Trade was of the utmost importance for these civilizations because it gave them the resources to live and prosper (years later, the money or currency). Through trade, not only goods were exchanged but ideas, traditions, culture, belief systems, stories, and language. One of the best examples of this is the Pantheon of gods that started with the Sumerians in Mesopotamia, which is very alike to the Pantheon of gods of Ancient Egypt, the Indus Valley Civilization, the Greek Pantheon, and the Roman Pantheon. All of them, very similar.
I think its D, they would be able to ship livestock via railroad
The Code of Hammurabi can tell us much about ancient Babylonian society, but cannot show us everything. The law code was written for the audience of Babylonian people in its own day, especially the scribes and officers of the law. So there are many questions we would have from a distance much later in history that people then would have understood without needing explanation. The intention of the law code was to inform people of laws and punishments, not to give later generations a full view of the whole of Babylonian life. The law code was prepared by those in power in the government of Hammurabi -- we don't get any response from the people or indication of how the people then viewed the laws. And ultimately, the law code is written in a detached, impersonal way -- as legal documents generally are written. We don't get a feel for the personal lives or feelings of people living at that time in Babylonia.
