The correct answer is redress.
Redressing is a process in which an individual tries to get the ruling of a previous court case changed. This process involves a system of appeals, with the Supreme Court being the highest court of appeals in the country. Any ruling that results from a Supreme Court trumps any state law currently in place. This is because the Supreme Court is the most powerful court in the United States of America.
If Mr. Smith won his case, it would set a new precedent (example) in the United States.
She should ask these three questions;
1) Do I need this car or should I use my old car a little longer?
2) Is this a reliable vehicle?
3) Will buying this car prevent me from saving money to buy a house?
All of these options are related to the financial planning which is the most logical and apt thing to consider when buying an expensive item, the other options are not relevant to the scenario.
No the correct answer s c is you are doing apex
Answer:
did not foster trust and cooperation.
Explanation:
Developing more favorable attitudes among participants in a dispute in cooperative situations fosters greater mutual trust and openness of communication, as well as providing a more stable basis for continued cooperation, despite the growth or undermining of certain objectives. This also encourages a perception of similarity of attitudes. However, communication does not bring the same benefits when participants are competitors. In this case, communication does not foster trust and cooperation.
Answer:
Explanation:
Base on the question, I would say that US wanted to group the Native American in communities so that the rest of the US could freely expands West ward, life was anti - Native American. I hope that you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have further clarification
