Answer:
The correct answer is C. In Tinker v. Des Moines Justice Fortas argues that it would be obvious that students' rights are violated "if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the Vietnam conflict . . . except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise."
Explanation:
The opinion of Justice Fortas, which corresponds to the majority position of the Court in the case, establishes that the prohibition to students to discuss positions regarding the Vietnam War is clearly in violation of the students' rights to express their opinions, which is framed in the right to freedom of speech guaranteed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
No, he cannot collect unemployment insurance because to get that insurance he has to be unemployed through no fault of his own. If he quit his job, he is willingly unemployed and thus, it is his own fault that he is unemployed and therefore, he is unqualified to receive unemployment insurance.
natural water barrier
mountains on the peninsula
more trade
Not sure where the applied answers are but I have this it would be both
<span>His accusers’ rhetoric is clumsy and awkward.
His rhetoric is more deliberate and well thought out.</span>
Answer:
quehhrhhgbbedhwhth4u5uut5r
Explanation:
ggsxggdgehufuuuzadnmgjhebwkfdrjgtrs
fuugtjhjjc
