2. What is the best summary of this passage?

Beth is writing an essay based on what she read in "The Most Dangerous Game, Part 1" and "The Most Dangerous Game, Part 2"Which

slamgirl [31]

The last excerpt is the answer, it explains how hes ready for a hunt but then sees a man

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which character responses best support the author’s purpose in chapter 7? Check all that apply. The dogs see to it that Napoleon

Maslowich

Answer:

A). The dogs see to it that Napoleon’s orders are carried out.

C). Four pigs confess that they have been secretly meeting with Snowball.

E). When the animals think about Snowball, they cannot sleep in their stalls.

F). Three hens claim that Snowball incited them to disobey Napoleon’s orders.

G). When the hens learn that they have to give up their eggs, they become upset.

Explanation:

The author's purpose in literature is described as the intent or reason for which the author has created a particular work which may involve entertaining, amusing, informing, or merely share an event or incident. Character responses play a crucial role in supporting the author's purpose as it assists in revealing the author's intent or reason.

As per the question, options A, C, E, F, and G exemplify the character response that backs the author's purpose. These character responses not only help unfold the story and take it forward but also assist in disclosing the author's intent to inform and share the description to the readers. Thus, options A, C, E, F, and G are correct answers.

4 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

ASAPPPP!!! Refer to Explorations in Literature for a complete version of this story. Which text from "After Twenty Years" provid

galben [10]

Answer:

Question 1.

The text from "After Twenty Years" that provides the best evidence that "Silky Bob" is surprised that his friend is now a policeman is:

'You’ve changed lots, Jimmy. I never thought you were so tall by two or three inches.'

Question 2:

This conversation is the climax of the story because:

The characters reach a turning point in the action when Bob is arrested.

Question 3:

The statement that best explains O. Henry's choice to have Jimmy write the note to Bob is:

It provides the reader with insight into Jimmy's character and illustrates how different the two men are after twenty years.

Question 4:

How O. Henry crafts "After Twenty Years" to create surprise is:

He conceals information about Jimmy until the end of the story.

Question 5:

The statement that best explains how the author's use of foreshadowing affects the story is:

It provides important information about the setting, showing that this area is being well-protected by a keen policeman.

Explanation:

The eventual meeting of two former childhood friends at an agreed spot in New York City was a short story by O. Henry to narrate how the two men had grown apart "After Twenty Years." One of the friends, Bob, who was trying to become rich, had instead become a crook and a wanted man by the Chicago Police, while the other, Jimmy, had grown unrecognizably taller and become a dutiful New York City police officer.

4 0

1 year ago

When formulating a research question, a researcher should write a question that

Amiraneli [1.4K]

I would say the correct answer is that has an undetermined answer.If a subject has been thoroughly covered, then there is no need for this researcher to do it all over again. If it's impossible to answer, there is no need to try. If it can be answered easily, then it doesn't really require a research. This leaves us with the last option, because a researcher might want to try and determine the answer.

8 0

1 year ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare and contrast W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux Arts" and William Carlos Williams's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus." Wha

Burka [1]

Compare and contrast W. H. Auden's "Musée des Beaux Arts" and William Carlos Williams's "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus."

What similarities and differences do you see in the way the poets present ideas to the reader?

The most important similarity between W.H. Auden and William Carlos Williams' poems is that both describe Pieter Brueghel's painting Landscape With The Fall of Icarus. Both poets illustrate the scene and all its surroundings with detail. Both poets exemplify with imagery the painting's scene and what it depicts.

Nevertheless, the poets do differ in other elements:

Auden presents his poem using free verse and divides it into two long stanzas without any rhyme. Although William Carlos Williams doesn't use rhyme either, he keeps a more traditional construction by dividing the poem into six stanzas with three lines in each.

Auden reflects on suffering and the burden of routine depicted in the painting with more delicate and meditative observations. He mentions Icarus in the second stanza and contemplates his psyche in a deeper way. Williams, on the other hand, presents his ideas in a concise manner. He states the reader the facts and describes the painting with concrete examples. He mentions Icarus since the first stanza but doesn't concentrate on what he might have felt or what others might be feeling in that precise moment.

Auden sensed the painting and tells the reader his experience when he saw it. Williams is an observer. He tells the reader a descriptive summary of what he saw without delving into his inner experience and thoughts.

3 0

2 years ago