The statement that best explains why Shakespeare has Cassius use the word <em>fawn</em> rather than a synonym such as <em>flatter</em> to describe his actions is the A: Fawn is more negative, suggesting manipulation of another for personal gain. In the excerpt that this question is referring to, the shrewd Cassius is going to reveal some aspects of Brutus's personality, or of his behavior, that he cannot see, and he asks him to trust in him, unless he saw him flattering somebody and then slandering him on their back; in that case, Cassius concludes, Brutus could be suspicious of him. Shakespeare is using the word <em>fawn </em>in Cassius's speech in order to emphasize his manipulative and devious traits. The word does have a negative connotation, and it often implies disapproval of that person's actions.
Answer:
Mrs. Pringle in her rants about her reputation comes across as, Compassionate while the change in her mood and words at the end of the play and the story show that she is pushy and domineering.
Explanation:
A Dinner Party is a drama which in which the main character is Mrs. Horace Pringle who hosted a Dinner Party and then she encounters unforeseen obstacles. She is Pushy and domineering lady as her moods changes while she is organizing a dinner party.
I'm not gonna write out 100 words, but I did find
-Alliteration in one-syllable words such as "break, blow, burn" creates a kind of beat and rhythm, and emphasises the meaning of those words
-There's definitely a lot of "me" in the sonnet, and the line "your viceroy in me, me should defend" uses repetition in "me" to emphasise it of course but also provides a good flow into the next line
The statement that best describes the fallacy in this passage is (A) Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.
Explanation:
The term fallacy is the use to show /support a invalid o, wrong or faulty reasoning, or "a wrong move"
Justice Taney claims that black people could not become the citizens of America , even though they have gained their freedom, because the Founders of american wanted it to happen. When the constitution was written the Black people never wanted to become the citizens . In the course this statement was not true, thus it is a fallacy statement.
Thus, The statement that best describes the fallacy in this passage is (A) Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.
