A physician recruiting his patients
<span>In deferential vulnerability the authority over the prospective subject is due to informal power relationships rather than formal hierarchies. The power relationship may be based on gender, race, or class inequalities, or they can be inequalities in knowledge (such as in the doctor-patient relationship). Like institutional vulnerability, deferential vulnerability increases the risk of harm that informed consent would be compromised because it is not fully voluntary.</span>
In this case, <span>she was using what your textbook calls EXPERT TESTIMONY
Expert testimony is a testimony that came from someone that has a credential in that specific field.
Example of expert testimony: </span>social security commissioner giving testimony about <span>social security system, astrophysicist giving testimony about planet's orbital condition, Bill Gates giving testimony about the condition of software market, etc.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Explanation:
Let's discard one by one.
Option A.
He should create a new diagnosis and inform the authors of the DSM-5.
Why not: Diagnostic labels cannot be created from one particular case. A psychiatrist or clinical psychologist is not entitled to create or formulate a personality disorder just because he/she feels like it.
Option B.
He should diagnose the client with Unspecified Personality Disorder (UPD)
Why not: In the DSM-5 the diagnosis of unspecified personality disorder is made only to enhance the specificity of an existing personality disorder.
Option C.
He should diagnose a different condition such as depression or anxiety as a "place holder" until the true nature of the personality problems is more fully understood.
Why not: T<u>his course of action is not ethical. Clinicians must not misdiagnose patients just because they feel like it. Diagnosing a patient with depression or anxiety without them falling within the diagnostic criteria is medical negligence. </u>
In conclusion, the correct answer is D. He should not make any diagnosis at all, since no condition in DSM-5 is satisfied by this clinical case.
Answer:
strengths-based management
Explanation:
Strengths- based management is a method of maximizing the success, efficiency, and productivity of an organization by focusing on and developing one's strength
