this past Sunday, the giants scored 9 less than twice the cowboys. the packers scored 14 points more than the giants. if the tea
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The four options are attached below
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
Second attachment is the correct choice
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
ASA (angle-side-angle) means that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle
<u>Now, let's check the choices:</u>
<u>First attachment:</u>
It shows that two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second one. This is congruency by SAS. Therefore, this option is incorrect
<u>Second attachment:</u>
It shows that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle. This is congruency by ASA. Therefore, this option is correct
<u>Third attachment:</u>
It shows that the three angles in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three angles in the second one. This is not enough to prove congruency. Therefore, this option is incorrect
<u>Fourth attachment:</u>
It shows that the three sides in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second one. This is congruency by SSS. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
Based on the above, the second attachment is the only correct one
Hope this helps :)
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
Second attachment is the correct choice
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
ASA (angle-side-angle) means that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and the included side between them in the second triangle
<u>Now, let's check the choices:</u>
<u>First attachment:</u>
It shows that two sides and the included angle between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second one. This is congruency by SAS. Therefore, this option is incorrect
<u>Second attachment:</u>
It shows that two angles and the included side between them in the first triangle is congruent to the corresponding two sides and the included angle between them in the second triangle. This is congruency by ASA. Therefore, this option is correct
<u>Third attachment:</u>
It shows that the three angles in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three angles in the second one. This is not enough to prove congruency. Therefore, this option is incorrect
<u>Fourth attachment:</u>
It shows that the three sides in the first triangle are congruent to the corresponding three sides in the second one. This is congruency by SSS. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
Based on the above, the second attachment is the only correct one
Hope this helps :)