Step 1
<u>Find the measure of angle x</u>
we know that
If ray NP bisects <MNQ
then
m<MNQ=m<PNM+m<PNQ ------> equation A
and
m<PNM=m<PNQ -------> equation B
we have that
m<MNQ=(8x+12)°
m<PNQ=78°
so
substitute in equation A
(8x+12)=78+78-------> 8x+12=156------> 8x=156-12
8x=144------> x=18°
Step 2
<u>Find the measure of angle y</u>
we have
m<PNM=(3y-9)°
m<PNM=78°
so
3y-9=78------> 3y=87------> y=29°
therefore
<u>the answer is</u>
the measure of x is 18° and the measure of y is 29°
Answer:
r = 0.9825; good correlation.
Step-by-step explanation:
One formula for the correlation coefficient is
![r = \dfrac{n\sum{xy} - \sum{x} \sum{y}}{\sqrt{n\left [\sum{x}^{2}-\left (\sum{x}\right )^{2}\right]\left [\sum{y}^{2}-\left (\sum{y}\right )^{2}\right]}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7Bn%5Csum%7Bxy%7D%20-%20%5Csum%7Bx%7D%20%5Csum%7By%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7Bn%5Cleft%20%5B%5Csum%7Bx%7D%5E%7B2%7D-%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%7Bx%7D%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%5Cright%5D%5Cleft%20%5B%5Csum%7By%7D%5E%7B2%7D-%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%7By%7D%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%5Cright%5D%7D%7D)
The calculation is not difficult, but it is tedious.
1. Calculate the intermediate numbers
We can display them in a table.
<u> </u><u>x</u> <u> y </u> <u> xy </u> <u> x² </u> <u> y² </u>
-3 -40 120 9 1600
1 12 12 1 144
5 72 360 25 5184
<u> 7</u> <u>137</u> <u> 959</u> <u>49</u> <u>18769
</u>
Σ = 10 181 1451 84 25697
2. Calculate the correlation coefficient
![r = \dfrac{n\sum{xy} - \sum{x} \sum{y}}{\sqrt{\left [n\sum{x}^{2}-\left (\sum{x}\right )^{2}\right]\left [n\sum{y}^{2}-\left (\sum{y}\right )^{2}\right]}}\\\\= \dfrac{4\times 1451 - 10\times 181}{\sqrt{[4\times 84 - 10^{2}][4\times25697 - 181^{2}]}}\\\\= \dfrac{5804 - 1810}{\sqrt{[336 - 100][102788 - 32761]}}\\\\= \dfrac{3994}{\sqrt{236\times70027}}\\\\= \dfrac{3994}{\sqrt{16526372}}\\\\= \dfrac{3994}{4065}\\\\= \mathbf{0.9825}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=r%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7Bn%5Csum%7Bxy%7D%20-%20%5Csum%7Bx%7D%20%5Csum%7By%7D%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5Cleft%20%5Bn%5Csum%7Bx%7D%5E%7B2%7D-%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%7Bx%7D%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%5Cright%5D%5Cleft%20%5Bn%5Csum%7By%7D%5E%7B2%7D-%5Cleft%20%28%5Csum%7By%7D%5Cright%20%29%5E%7B2%7D%5Cright%5D%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B4%5Ctimes%201451%20-%2010%5Ctimes%20181%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5B4%5Ctimes%2084%20-%2010%5E%7B2%7D%5D%5B4%5Ctimes25697%20-%20181%5E%7B2%7D%5D%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B5804%20-%201810%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B%5B336%20-%20100%5D%5B102788%20-%2032761%5D%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B3994%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B236%5Ctimes70027%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B3994%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B16526372%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B3994%7D%7B4065%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cmathbf%7B0.9825%7D)
The closer the value of r is to +1 or -1, the better the correlation is. The values of x and y are highly correlated.
Answer: The conditional statements are not in the correct form to make a conclusion using the law of syllogism. “If p, then q and if p, then r” cannot be used to draw a conclusion using the law of syllogism. The law of syllogism could be used if the hypothesis in the second statement was "if two pairs of congruent angles are formed."
Step-by-step explanation:
"If p, then q and if p, then r" cannot be used to draw a conclusion using the law of syllogism.
Neither of the conclusions of the conditional statements are the hypothesis of the other.
"If two pairs of congruent angles are formed" could be the hypothesis of the second statement.
** Both can be used to answer the question :)
Answer:
140y
Step-by-step explanation:
35 times a number times -4 is 35×y×(-4) which is -140y
Answer:
The expressions are not equivalent because Ella did not know that you can’t use substitution to test for equivalence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Equivalent algebraic expressions are those expressions which on simplification give the same resulting expression.
Two algebraic expressions are said to be equivalent if their values obtained by substituting any values of the variables are same.
Two expressions 3f+2.6 and 2f+2.6 are not equivalent, because when f=1,
3f + 2.6 = 3.1 + 2.6 = 3 + 2.6 = 5.6
2f + 2.6 = 2.1 + 2.6 = 2 + 2.6 = 4.6
5.6 = 4.6
Method of substitution can only help her to decide the expresssions are not equivalent, but if she wants to prove the expressions are equivalent, she must prove it for all values of f.
3f + 2.6 = 2f + 2.6
3f = 2f
3f - 2f = 0
f = 0
This is true only when f=0.
Hence,
The expressions are not equivalent because Ella did not know that you can’t use substitution to test for equivalence.