He recommends the volunteers to allow the children to learn by doing things themselves and ask open ended questions to stimulate thinking~
Answer:
The answer is <em>Probably true</em>
Explanation:
The answer is <em>probably true</em> as a result of the fact that the some personnel exhbited greater survival survival knowledge or skill over others. This could be as a result of previous experience the migh have had when they are in difficult situation or it could be as a result of their previous training the might have undergone whose knowledge the applied in addition to the training the had during the experiment to find out what kinds of people function best under severe arctic climatic conditions.
The assumption could not be a certainty as a result of other underlying factors that might have lead to some of the personnel exhibiting greater arctic survival knowledge or skill than others.
In this context, <span>a probable reason for Dr. Farah's choice not to conduct an experiment is because </span><span>It would be unethical to manipulate whether students are told to do homework for a semester.
Even though the mainpulation is important for the data, it could has the potential of destroying the subject's life in the future.</span>
Answer:
Optimism bias
Explanation:
In psychology, the term optimism bias refers to a bias where the person believes that they are not likely to experience a negative event in their life. In other words, it is an unrealistic optimism by which the person believes that things will always go their way.
In this example Deunoro believes that he has incredible abilities and that he will easily get a job when he finishes college and that we will always remain employed. This is an unrealistic expectation he has, and <u>he thinks that things will always go their way without experience a negative event</u>. Therefore, this is an example of Optimism bias.
The Nixon case is a perfect demonstration of separation of powers which is a key tenet in democracy. Although Nixon argued that he enjoyed executive privilege and that the judiciary lacked power to compel him in the exercise of his discretion, the court upheld a decision compelling him to disclose material for evidence. Also, his conduct was investigated by Congress. This shows the separation of powers between the Judiciary, Executive and the Legislature.<span>
</span>